回复：I think USCIS made a mistake on your wife's case

win963852741,

No matter it's for primary applicant or for dependant, I believe 180-day ruly applies. So I don't think the following statement is true.

"if the principal is eligible for adjustment of status under section 245(k), the spouse and minor, unmarried children may adjust status under section 245(k) even if they have been out-of- status for over 180 days.
"
If you're sure about this statement, can you share from where you got this info?

所有跟帖： 

• read it again, it says what u suggested -win963852741- ♂ (169 bytes) () 02/27/2008 postreply 10:59:03

• 回复：read it again, it says what u suggested -gcemerg- ♂ (402 bytes) () 02/27/2008 postreply 11:07:08

• agree -win963852741- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/27/2008 postreply 11:12:33

• 回复：回复：read it again, it says what u suggested -isman- ♂ (103 bytes) () 02/27/2008 postreply 11:31:50

• have u talk to a lawyer yet? -win963852741- ♂ (54 bytes) () 02/27/2008 postreply 11:46:44

• 我的律师说245（k)不适用于我太太这种情况， 因为她曾是F-1 status -isman- ♂ (0 bytes) () 02/27/2008 postreply 12:16:59

• 回复：我的律师说245（k)不适用于我太太这种情况， 因为她曾是F-1 status -gcemerg- ♂ (861 bytes) () 02/27/2008 postreply 12:47:51

• 回复：我觉得有点危险。 -红叶- ♀ (545 bytes) () 02/27/2008 postreply 14:26:58

• here is the link for 245k -win963852741- ♂ (87 bytes) () 02/27/2008 postreply 11:03:26