参院 Bill 关于Employment Base 的澄清

我在http://www.senate.org上所能找到的Bill, amendment 似乎都只是Family Based filed after May 1, 2005需要从新file. Employment pending/approved immigration petition could serve as the base for adjustment of status.

这似乎与USA TODAY矛盾, 有人能发现USA TODAY 所依据的Bill原文吗?

Amendment introduced by Sanders 也并未要求Employment Based 从新file.

Any comments?

所有跟帖： 

• sorry, should be senate.gov -chinatea- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/28/2007 postreply 22:57:01

• 我也找了半天,没找到这个法案 -灌水专用名- ♂ (275 bytes) () 05/28/2007 postreply 23:06:34

• 《世界日报》5月10日的报导： -红叶- ♀ (1250 bytes) () 05/28/2007 postreply 23:36:13

• if happend in Canada before. -DO-PERM- ♂ (158 bytes) () 05/28/2007 postreply 23:40:12

• 到时候这些人来个CLASS ACTION,就够他们受的了 -灌水专用名- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/29/2007 postreply 00:00:51

• 请看小白兔的回答，05／01／05 cut-off包括EB 申请 -nonpro- ♂ (315 bytes) () 05/29/2007 postreply 06:02:47

• 回复：请看小白兔的回答，05／01／05 cut-off包括EB 申请 -请帮忙出主意- ♀ (57 bytes) () 05/29/2007 postreply 06:46:49

• 回复：请看小白兔的回答，05／01／05 cut-off包括EB 申请 -phate2006- ♂ (171 bytes) () 05/29/2007 postreply 07:51:22

• xiaobaitu, where did you find your source? -chinatea- ♂ (7 bytes) () 05/29/2007 postreply 07:14:46