有区别吗？

I-864以前需要公证才有效，现在只需本人签名，但加入了Under the penalty of perjury 条款。在美国，这大概比国内公证处的印章更有效吧？

现在觉着'我为鱼肉'说得有些道理了。

所有跟帖： 

• I-864并非任何情况下都不需要公证，在广州领馆办理移民就 -xiaobaitu- ♀ (150 bytes) () 05/25/2007 postreply 23:25:48

• AS said, notary public only notarized the translation and leaves -mission08- ♂ (84 bytes) () 05/25/2007 postreply 23:31:48

• Many I-485 cases are approved without interview at all. -mission08- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/25/2007 postreply 23:32:39

• I-864 only are required by the I-485 base on marriage -xiaobaitu- ♀ (61 bytes) () 05/25/2007 postreply 23:41:17

• wrong -- it is required for all FB based I-485 -mission08- ♂ (72 bytes) () 05/25/2007 postreply 23:47:51

• so funny，人家问结婚，你扯父母 -xiaobaitu- ♀ (0 bytes) () 05/25/2007 postreply 23:50:07

• i thought she asked for marriage certificate, not -mission08- ♂ (37 bytes) () 05/25/2007 postreply 23:51:34

• I mean, marriage cert is also required when USC sponsors DAD. -mission08- ♂ (0 bytes) () 05/26/2007 postreply 00:13:11

• 只有中国政府的公证处或是中国驻美使领馆才有资格证明 -xiaobaitu- ♀ (27 bytes) () 05/25/2007 postreply 23:27:40

• The marriage certificate itself proves the legal fact so all -mission08- ♂ (212 bytes) () 05/25/2007 postreply 23:30:38