Ivy or top LAC under then PhD these schools = ideal track

所有跟帖： 

• 嗯嗯，我只是感叹一下自己眼界好低 -七月徐风- ♀ (347 bytes) () 04/28/2022 postreply 05:46:31

• Under should still be education, not professional training -fakegreen- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/28/2022 postreply 05:49:53

• 有道理 -七月徐风- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/28/2022 postreply 05:55:32

• 很错误的看法 -凊荷- ♀ (27 bytes) () 04/28/2022 postreply 05:49:01

• 为啥开口闭口就说别人错误呢 -七月徐风- ♀ (107 bytes) () 04/28/2022 postreply 05:50:41

• 说反了吧 -凊荷- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/28/2022 postreply 05:52:11

• 你不更跳出来开主贴说别人错吗，哈哈 -江南岸飞雪- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/28/2022 postreply 06:04:22

• 哪句啊，请明示？ -七月徐风- ♀ (279 bytes) () 04/28/2022 postreply 06:05:07

• 如果不想去phd，under怎么选？ -棉袄的妈- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/28/2022 postreply 05:58:26

• If you want to be engineer then big state, scientist Ivy/LAC -fakegreen- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/28/2022 postreply 06:00:14

• 哈哈你还是等于没说啊，科学家哪有本科做的？都得是phd不是？所以结论就是本科CS奔州大？ -棉袄的妈- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/28/2022 postreply 06:03:04

• Thinkers go to Ivy/LAC ，doers big state -fakegreen- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/28/2022 postreply 06:06:37

• 就是leader 和builder,是不是这意思？ -七月徐风- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/28/2022 postreply 06:07:35

• Professors believe this and they teach this way -fakegreen- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/28/2022 postreply 07:04:53

• Ivy/LAC teach you why, and big states teach you how -fakegreen- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/28/2022 postreply 06:12:16

• em 有道理，让我想一想需要时间来solidify你的观点lol -棉袄的妈- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/28/2022 postreply 06:17:21

• 因果还是要搞清楚 大藤本科出的科学家多是因为科学家爸爸多 不是因为教育质量多好 -胖胖爸- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/28/2022 postreply 06:02:56