你是属于典型被媒体忽悠的人：

电车起火的概率远远低于油车

https://thedriven.io/2023/09/20/electric-vehicle-fires-are-rare-risk-for-petrol-and-diesel-vehicles-at-least-20-times-higher/

How common are these fires?

 

Australian firm EV FireSafe tracks passenger electric vehicle battery fires worldwide. From 2010 to June 2023, its database records only 393 verified fires globally, out of some 30 million electric vehicles on the road.

Australia recorded only four electric vehicle battery fires over the same period. One was linked to arson. The other three vehicles were parked in structures that burned down and destroyed the vehicles. So it appears these fires didn’t start in the batteries.

 

But electric vehicle numbers in Australia were low during this 13-year period.

 

Are the risks higher than for petrol or diesel cars?

As electric vehicle numbers grow, this week’s reports might lead some people to fear fire risks will increase. However, data for the past 13 years suggest quite the opposite is true as electric vehicles replace petrol and diesel vehicles.

 

A May 2023 report by the Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency found vehicles powered by internal combustion engines were 20 times more likely to catch fire than electric vehicles in Sweden.

Sweden recorded 106 fires in various electrified modes of transport in 2022. More than half were in e-scooters (38) and e-bikes (20). Out of Sweden’s 611,000 electric vehicles, 23 fires (0.004%) were reported. The fleet of 4.4 million petrol and diesel vehicles recorded 3,400 fires (0.08%).

 

Globally, EV FireSafe found about 0.0012% of electric passenger vehicles caught fire from 2010 to 2023. While it was difficult to find similar global statistics for petrol and diesel vehicles, EV Firesafe used a range of country reports and found a much higher 0.1% risk of catching fire. That’s more than 80 times the rate EV Firesafe found for electric vehicles.

 

As well as 393 verified fires worldwide, the EV Firesafe database includes 74 incidents that are being investigated and 21 that have not been verified.

 

A 2020 Tesla internal report (not verified independently) suggested there was one Tesla fire for every 205 million miles (330 million kilometres) travelled. The Tesla report notes National Fire Protection Association data for the United States showed a much higher rate of one fire for every 19 million miles (30.6 million kilometres).

We still have limited data on fire risk in electric vehicles, most of which are relatively new. More statistically reliable comparisons require more data over much longer time frames.

 

-----------------------------------

 

电车技术改进的速度远远高于油车，所以，电车相对油车的安全性也会越来越好

 

最简单的一个道理，就是你前面没有发动机那个大铁块，你活命的概率就已增加了很多！

 

-----------------------------------

 

2018年俺买特斯拉前，对这个电车是否容易起火做了很详细的研究，

那时就发现电车这方面已经比油车安全多了，尤其是比宝马同等价位的一些油车

到现在，电车的记录（至少是特斯拉）就更好了

一龙一大特点是，对期限很松，可以一拖再拖；对工程技术，绝不马虎；对不尊重科学事实的人，嫉恶如仇

 

-----------------------------

汽车公司是媒体最大的一个客户来源，所以电车有什么问题，媒体里拼命宣扬；而汽车着火了，一般掩盖不报！

你们这种人，只会看标题，严重受媒体影响，最后亏的只是自己，被烧的也是自己

 

所有跟帖： 

• 统计表明：电池自体燃烧引爆占38%，比例够高！在路上开着开着突然电池自燃爆炸了，谁不怕？马斯克愚弄缺少资讯的人而已！ -交易员- ♂ (81 bytes) () 09/28/2023 postreply 13:28:26

• 你以为油车不自燃啊？ -dividend_growth- ♀ (81 bytes) () 09/28/2023 postreply 14:47:13

• 这不，又一个油车容易自燃起火被RECALL -dividend_growth- ♀ (3067 bytes) () 09/28/2023 postreply 16:56:44