If the Government takes care of Sillicon Valley Bank depositors, but the share holders are wiped out, what is the legal basis for that? Why share holders don't get bailed out?
I'm just curious. I don't hold SVB stocks.
If the Government takes care of Sillicon Valley Bank depositors, but the share holders are wiped out, what is the legal basis for that? Why share holders don't get bailed out?
I'm just curious. I don't hold SVB stocks.
• 股东享受红利的同时也有还债的义务,资不抵债就raise capital,追加投资失败就破产。 -BeyondWind- ♂ (0 bytes) () 03/12/2023 postreply 10:37:50