狗了石正丽参与的论文

https://www.nature.com/articles/nm.3985?fbclid=IwAR0iTTfDlT-uxNFPtvQH-xFrF6QaF1hKE1Ey2TPrEi17XfFUElbpUlAosDc

这个有意思

Change history

• 20 November 2015

  In the version of this article initially published online, the authors omitted to acknowledge a funding source, USAID-EPT-PREDICT funding from EcoHealth Alliance, to Z.-L.S. The error has been corrected for the print, PDF and HTML versions of this article.

所有跟帖： 

• 这里看作者资料 -buydip?- ♀ (9314 bytes) () 02/15/2020 postreply 20:53:12

• 看上去北卡教堂山分校是主力，资金也是美国的。拿这篇论文去攻击石正丽很没有说服力。 -buydip?- ♀ (0 bytes) () 02/15/2020 postreply 21:01:28