现在有了很多AI可以对话，我就试试最常用的3个，
ChatGPT ， Gemini，和 perplexity。
我自己的情况交作业，比较一下成绩单，
其中perplexity 最详细，
Side?by?side comparison
| Strategy | Annual return assumption | 25?year yearly contribution | Approx. value after 25 years |
|---|---|---|---|
| VOO | 10% | 30,000 USD | ≈ 3.0 million USD |
| QQQ | 14% | 30,000 USD | ≈ 6.1 million USD |
Returns for QQQ are more volatile and the future may be very different from the past, so the higher figure is not guaranteed. VOO’s S&P 500 exposure is usually considered more diversified, with somewhat lower risk and lower expected return.
You’re now adding three lump sums into the same fund:
-
100k in 2003.
-
100k in 2010.
-
100k in 2022.
Extra 100k’s in VOO (10%/yr)
Years of growth to early 2026 (approx):
-
2003 → ~23 years.
-
2010 → ~16 years.
-
2022 → ~4 years.
Using FV=100,000×(1.10)n:
-
2003 100k: 100,000×(1.10)23≈100,000×8.0≈800,000.
-
2010 100k: 100,000×(1.10)16≈100,000×4.6≈460,000.
-
2022 100k: 100,000×(1.10)4≈100,000×1.46≈146,000.
Total from the three lumps in VOO:
≈ 800k + 460k + 146k ≈ 1.41M USD.
Add to the earlier 3.0M stream result:
-
VOO total ≈ 3.0M + 1.41M ≈ 4.4M USD.
Extra 100k’s in QQQ (14%/yr)
Same timing, but with r=14%:
-
2003 → ~23 years.
-
2010 → ~16 years.
-
2022 → ~4 years.
Using FV=100,000×(1.14)n:
-
2003 100k: (1.14)23≈26 → ≈ 2.6M USD.
-
2010 100k: (1.14)16≈7.8 → ≈ 780k USD.
-
2022 100k: (1.14)4≈1.75 → ≈ 175k USD.
Total from the three lumps in QQQ:
≈ 2.6M + 0.78M + 0.175M ≈ 3.55M USD.
Add to the earlier 6.1M stream result:
-
QQQ total ≈ 6.1M + 3.55M ≈ 8.1M USD.?
Quick comparison
| Fund | 25 yrs of 30k/yr | Extra 100k (2003, 2010, 2022) | Approx total now |
|---|---|---|---|
| VOO | ≈ 3.0M USD | ≈ 1.4M USD | ≈ 4.4M USD |
| QQQ | ≈ 6.1M USD | ≈ 3.6M USD | ≈ 8.1M USD |
These numbers assume smooth average annual returns, ignore taxes and fees, and use rounded exponents, so reality could be significantly higher or lower in any specific period.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
从比较到跳跃到目前，
How to think about the 12?unit deal
We’re missing key numbers: purchase price, expenses, and how much down payment/lending structure. So I’ll show you what you should check, not just “yes/no”.
For the new property (12 units, 32k/month rent):
-
Estimate realistic expenses
-
Operating expenses (tax, insurance, maintenance, management, utilities you cover) often run 30–50% of gross rent.
-
Example: if we assume 40%:
-
Gross: 32k/month
-
Operating expenses (40%): ~12.8k
-
NOI (before loan): ~19.2k/month (~230k/year).
-
-
-
Decide down payment and loan
-
Suppose price is P, loan is L, interest rate r, amortization 25–30 years.
-
Calculate monthly payment; that will tell you whether it adds or subtracts real cash flow.
-
-
Key metrics to test
-
Net cash flow: Will this deal increase your monthly cash flow, or reduce it?
-
Cash?on?cash return:
-
Net yearly cash flow ÷ your actual cash invested (down payment + closing + capex).
-
For the risk you’re already carrying, I’d want this new deal to be clearly above 5–6%, ideally higher.
-
-
DSCR on the new loan: NOI ÷ annual debt service. Aim comfortably >1.20, ideally ~1.3–1.4+.
-
If, after all realistic expenses and debt, the 12?unit only gives you a small extra cash flow (or is negative), then you’re taking on more concentration and work without enough reward.
Strategic question: growth vs consolidation
Right now:
-
You already have:
-
High net worth (≈11.8M equity).
-
Good positive cash flow (25k/month).
-
Significant leverage (≈8.5M total debt).
-
The trade?off:
-
Buying the 12?unit:
-
Pros: more units, more diversification within real estate, potential appreciation, more economies of scale.
-
Cons: more leverage and complexity, more exposure to one asset class and interest?rate cycles, more management problems.
-
-
Not buying (or buying something smaller/better yielding):
-
Pros: you lock in a strong position, can use 700k for reserves, selective upgrades, or diversification into liquid investments (VOO/Treasuries) to reduce risk.
-
Cons: slower growth in units and real?estate equity.
-
Given your already large portfolio, the bar for a new deal should be high. The 12?unit should:
-
Improve your total cash flow meaningfully (not just slightly).
-
Offer a strong cash?on?cash return on the new money you put in.
-
Not push your overall risk (DSCR, vacancy tolerance, reserves) into a dangerous zone.
Practical decision rule
Before you commit, I’d do this for the 12?unit:
-
Get:
-
Actual asking price.
-
Realistic pro?forma: taxes after reassessment, insurance, maintenance, management, utilities, repairs, vacancy.
-
Financing terms (rate, amortization, down payment).
-
-
Calculate:
-
NOI, annual debt service, net cash flow.
-
Cash?on?cash on your down payment.
-
DSCR for the property and your whole portfolio.
-
-
Only proceed if:
-
Net cash flow is strongly positive and improves your total monthly cash flow,
-
Cash?on?cash is clearly attractive (e.g., >7–8% for the new equity, given your size and risk),
-
DSCR remains healthy and you still have solid cash reserves after closing (not using the entire 700k).
-
If you share the expected purchase price, interest rate, and down payment, I can walk through the actual numbers and tell you if the 12?unit looks financially “must?buy”, “OK”, or “too much risk for too little return” in your situation.
