刚刚收到NSC 140 Eb1-a的Ref letter， 要求在2月25号前回复，万分焦急。我是EB1-a
DIY的，希望大家能帮我出出主意，Blessing!
NSC, RD is 2007/12/21
先晒晒背景
Postdoc, PhD in Food Science
1.Awards: 本专业2007 International young Investigator Award, 全美一个 (提交
时提供了Sigma Xi主席亲自写的祝贺信)
1 Outstanding Paper Award (China)
2. Membership: Sigma Xi, 2个专业协会，5个杂志Editor Board member
3. Media report: Sigma Xi newsletter, university newspaper (NSC说地方的杂志
和报道不能满足要求)
4 Review experience: reviewed 49 manuscripts for 17 Journals in Food Science
, 5个杂志的编辑提供support letters to show extraordinary ability
5. Publications:
27 papers in international peer-reviewed journal. 14 first author. 10 second
- author. Four papers were selected by the ScienceDirect.com on the list of
Top25 Hottest Articles within four journals.
6. Citations: 38 citations (now 110 times)
7. References: 7 reference letters (5 independent)
Ref decision was approved by Director Gerard Heinauer (NSC/NLL EX 0159)
Ref letter如下:
2. Membership in associations in the field which require outstanding
achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts;
The record shows that the petitioner is a member in several scientific
societies. However, as the record did not include information regarding the
membership standards for these societies and subscription, they cannot be
considered to be sufficient evidence of extraordinary ability. If further
evidence of this criterion is to be submitted, it must include information
regarding the requirements necessary to meet for membership and demonstrate
that it is evidence of extraordinary ability.
感觉Sigma Xi和其他专业协会现在很难满足这条，似乎非要做到专业的Fellow才能NSC
的标准，但毕竟不是我们Postdoc能达到的，所以这点我准备放弃。有更好的建议么？
3. Published material about the alien in professional or major trade
publications or other major media;
The record shows several citations made by others of the petitioner’s work,
but this criterion requires that the evidence of article of articles about
the petitioner’s work, not articles that reference them to support their
own. If further evidence of this criterion is to be submitted, it must also
clearly indicate that the work is significant: an unevaluated listing in a
subject matter index or footnote, or a reference to the work without
evaluation is insufficient, or a mere reference to his work or inclusion of
his publications in bibliographies or footnote, would also be insufficient
for this criterion.
这里是不是不仅仅要列出citation的list，还要找出别人的文章怎么评价我的工作的？
大家有没有更好的建议？我是不是在回复中加上updated citation list?
4. Participation on a panel or individually as a judge of the work of others
in the field or an allied field;
The record shows that the petitioner has participated in the peer review
process. While this suggests recognition of the petitioner’s knowledge and
competence, but further is needed to show the petitioner has extraordinary
ability. If further evidence of this criterion is to be submitted, it must
include information regarding the criteria for selection as panelist,
reviewer, etc.
在这项，我列出了所有审的49篇文章的Invitation letter和Thank you letter。而且
让5个杂志的编辑提供support letters to show extraordinary ability，但是NSC看
来还不满足，真不知道他们想要啥样子的？各位有没有好的建议？
5. Original scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business-related
contributions of major significance in the field;
The record does not show such evidence.
NSC的意思是我不满足这项要求，而我感觉这项恰恰是每个人几乎都符合的。我在这项
陈述的是用所有Reference对我工作的评价，大家有没有更好的建议？
6. Authorship of scholarly articles in the field, in professional or major
trade publications or other major media;
The record shows that the petitioner has had articles published and that
others have cited them. However, as the publication of article is part of
the career path of a research scientist, additional evidence, such as
further documentation of published articles cited them, is need to show that
the beneficiary has national or international acclaim for having
extraordinary ability.
这里我感觉只需要列出所有发表的文章的List，不知道怎么NSC在这项还需要列出其他
研究者对我文章的citation,感觉和前面重复了。
在NSC吃了Ref，心里没底，感觉要被据了，大家有没有更好的建议给我，先谢过了!!!
DIY的，希望大家能帮我出出主意，Blessing!
NSC, RD is 2007/12/21
先晒晒背景
Postdoc, PhD in Food Science
1.Awards: 本专业2007 International young Investigator Award, 全美一个 (提交
时提供了Sigma Xi主席亲自写的祝贺信)
1 Outstanding Paper Award (China)
2. Membership: Sigma Xi, 2个专业协会，5个杂志Editor Board member
3. Media report: Sigma Xi newsletter, university newspaper (NSC说地方的杂志
和报道不能满足要求)
4 Review experience: reviewed 49 manuscripts for 17 Journals in Food Science
, 5个杂志的编辑提供support letters to show extraordinary ability
5. Publications:
27 papers in international peer-reviewed journal. 14 first author. 10 second
- author. Four papers were selected by the ScienceDirect.com on the list of
Top25 Hottest Articles within four journals.
6. Citations: 38 citations (now 110 times)
7. References: 7 reference letters (5 independent)
Ref decision was approved by Director Gerard Heinauer (NSC/NLL EX 0159)
Ref letter如下:
2. Membership in associations in the field which require outstanding
achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts;
The record shows that the petitioner is a member in several scientific
societies. However, as the record did not include information regarding the
membership standards for these societies and subscription, they cannot be
considered to be sufficient evidence of extraordinary ability. If further
evidence of this criterion is to be submitted, it must include information
regarding the requirements necessary to meet for membership and demonstrate
that it is evidence of extraordinary ability.
感觉Sigma Xi和其他专业协会现在很难满足这条，似乎非要做到专业的Fellow才能NSC
的标准，但毕竟不是我们Postdoc能达到的，所以这点我准备放弃。有更好的建议么？
3. Published material about the alien in professional or major trade
publications or other major media;
The record shows several citations made by others of the petitioner’s work,
but this criterion requires that the evidence of article of articles about
the petitioner’s work, not articles that reference them to support their
own. If further evidence of this criterion is to be submitted, it must also
clearly indicate that the work is significant: an unevaluated listing in a
subject matter index or footnote, or a reference to the work without
evaluation is insufficient, or a mere reference to his work or inclusion of
his publications in bibliographies or footnote, would also be insufficient
for this criterion.
这里是不是不仅仅要列出citation的list，还要找出别人的文章怎么评价我的工作的？
大家有没有更好的建议？我是不是在回复中加上updated citation list?
4. Participation on a panel or individually as a judge of the work of others
in the field or an allied field;
The record shows that the petitioner has participated in the peer review
process. While this suggests recognition of the petitioner’s knowledge and
competence, but further is needed to show the petitioner has extraordinary
ability. If further evidence of this criterion is to be submitted, it must
include information regarding the criteria for selection as panelist,
reviewer, etc.
在这项，我列出了所有审的49篇文章的Invitation letter和Thank you letter。而且
让5个杂志的编辑提供support letters to show extraordinary ability，但是NSC看
来还不满足，真不知道他们想要啥样子的？各位有没有好的建议？
5. Original scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business-related
contributions of major significance in the field;
The record does not show such evidence.
NSC的意思是我不满足这项要求，而我感觉这项恰恰是每个人几乎都符合的。我在这项
陈述的是用所有Reference对我工作的评价，大家有没有更好的建议？
6. Authorship of scholarly articles in the field, in professional or major
trade publications or other major media;
The record shows that the petitioner has had articles published and that
others have cited them. However, as the publication of article is part of
the career path of a research scientist, additional evidence, such as
further documentation of published articles cited them, is need to show that
the beneficiary has national or international acclaim for having
extraordinary ability.
这里我感觉只需要列出所有发表的文章的List，不知道怎么NSC在这项还需要列出其他
研究者对我文章的citation,感觉和前面重复了。
在NSC吃了Ref，心里没底，感觉要被据了，大家有没有更好的建议给我，先谢过了!!!
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”
