现在法官们是不是在瑟瑟发抖?万斯和马斯克要对付他们了?

Vance and Musk question the authority of the courts as Trump’s agenda faces legal pushback

Top Trump administration officials are openly questioning the judiciary’s authority to serve as a check on executive power as the new president’s sweeping agenda faces growing pushback from the courts.

Over the past 24 hours, officials ranging from billionaire Elon Musk to Vice President JD Vance have not only criticized a federal judge’s decision early Saturday that blocks Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency from accessing Treasury Department records, but have also attacked the legitimacy of judicial oversight, a fundamental pillar of American democracy, which is based on the separation of powers.

“If a judge tried to tell a general how to conduct a military operation, that would be illegal. If a judge tried to command the attorney general in how to use her discretion as a prosecutor, that’s also illegal. Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” Vance wrote on X on Sunday morning.

That post came hours after Musk said overnight that the judge who ruled against him should be impeached.

“A corrupt judge protecting corruption. He needs to be impeached NOW!” said Musk, who has been tasked by President Donald Trump with rooting out waste across the federal government.

所有跟帖: 

nobody is above the law, including judge -odamae- 给 odamae 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 02/10/2025 postreply 06:25:33

some of these judges overreached -odamae- 给 odamae 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 02/10/2025 postreply 06:35:56

新皇帝登基,任何意见不同者都会瑟瑟发抖 -redpanda- 给 redpanda 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 02/10/2025 postreply 06:27:03

真的有皇帝了。美国三权分立休也 -gccard- 给 gccard 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 02/10/2025 postreply 06:31:42

太棒了 -FollowNature- 给 FollowNature 发送悄悄话 FollowNature 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 02/10/2025 postreply 06:51:00

滥用法律权力迫害别人的同样应该被法律制裁 -Sandcity2000- 给 Sandcity2000 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 02/10/2025 postreply 06:53:44

美国也要定于一尊了?三权分立说垮就垮啊,民主制度真的很脆弱 -爬山看秋叶- 给 爬山看秋叶 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 02/10/2025 postreply 06:54:50

不让judge干涉才是维护三权分立 -凊荷- 给 凊荷 发送悄悄话 凊荷 的博客首页 (82 bytes) () 02/10/2025 postreply 07:22:55

Vance法学位还是有用的,Cotton也是律师,说话都扛扛的 -abzy10- 给 abzy10 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 02/10/2025 postreply 07:19:00

三权分立也不应该允许一个小破法官就能block总统令;只有最高法院才应该有这种权限 -过来人2- 给 过来人2 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 02/10/2025 postreply 07:22:32

三权分立就是法官不能干涉行政 -凊荷- 给 凊荷 发送悄悄话 凊荷 的博客首页 (39 bytes) () 02/10/2025 postreply 07:23:55

本来check and balance是指司法系统可以裁定行政命令违法因而block,但是应该只有最高法院才有资格裁定 -过来人2- 给 过来人2 发送悄悄话 (140 bytes) () 02/10/2025 postreply 07:28:12

美国是海洋体系,法官的权力都是从以前案例来的,包括最高法院的释宪权 -cn_abcd- 给 cn_abcd 发送悄悄话 cn_abcd 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 02/10/2025 postreply 07:37:35

三权分立本意就是国会和法院对政府实施监督,政府做得不合法的地方法院实施干预 -天青水蓝- 给 天青水蓝 发送悄悄话 天青水蓝 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 02/10/2025 postreply 09:22:46

最高法院处理不了那么多案子,所以联邦地方法院一审,不服的上诉联邦巡回上诉法院再不服才能上诉最高法。没任何国家最高法是一审 -天青水蓝- 给 天青水蓝 发送悄悄话 天青水蓝 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 02/10/2025 postreply 07:51:05

从程序公正来说,如果最高法是一审法院,那所有判决都是最终裁决,任何一方都无权上诉,判决如果有错误根本没有纠正的机会 -天青水蓝- 给 天青水蓝 发送悄悄话 天青水蓝 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 02/10/2025 postreply 07:53:55

这不是主要的原因,最高法院只有9个法官,根本没有这个能力去审判这么多案件 -cn_abcd- 给 cn_abcd 发送悄悄话 cn_abcd 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 02/10/2025 postreply 08:00:50

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!