史学家如果有错会有另外的史学家反驳。另外正因为你没真正读过史家（比如Paxton）才以为法国海军会被希特勒“染指”，读了

就知道不可能

Let's 继续读 Paxton:“At Toulon, the French High Seas Fleet was scuttled in the early morning of November 27, as German troops forced their way into the naval base. No formal order to escape was transmitted. Submarines were instructed to sink themselves outside the harbor, however, and three of the ten submarines took this opportunity to sail to Algiers, and another to Barcelona. Except for these four vessels, all the ships at Toulon were destroyed rather than violate neutrality”

 

所有跟帖： 

• 这个我承认啊。我看书的确就是娱乐，一般跟着NYT bestseller书单来读，是面向普通大众的，不是你说的“真正”史书 -糯米粥- ♀ (390 bytes) () 08/02/2022 postreply 07:12:07

• 按你的描述你那本书就是误人子弟啊。再说翻案的是对历史事件的解释，不是事件本身。相信你自己也有分析能力，才不至于人云亦云 -papyrus- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/02/2022 postreply 07:17:39

• 嘻嘻， 咱们这一系列关于二战的瞎聊，有一条围绕“责任”的暗线. 我要是小结一下： -糯米粥- ♀ (570 bytes) () 08/02/2022 postreply 07:56:33

• “唉，昨天还……”，我感觉到你的叹气无奈了；“再说翻案的是对历史事件的解释，不是事件本身……”，这不就是我上次讲的 -土豆-禾苗- ♂ (678 bytes) () 08/02/2022 postreply 11:31:34

• 哈哈，知我者土豆也 -papyrus- ♂ (151 bytes) () 08/02/2022 postreply 12:53:38