People who did not restrict their AP were actually
1. trenching on public space because their signal were shooting beyond the boundary of their property;
2. broadcasting their signal, therefore they had no right to say others were stealing (can a radio stations say people who listen to their broadcast are stealing? can a resturant charge people on street when resturants' food smell going out of resturant?)
If someone break into a password protected or non-broadcasted network then and only then it can be called stealing. How can someone staying in his or her house get a uninvited signal get accused of stealing?
People who broadcast their signal should be responsible for their signal be confined ih their property even though they paid for it.
You can defend yourself in
所有跟帖:
•
我建议你看看新闻。前几个星期就有两个倒霉蛋在别人家门口用不设
-Grant-
♂
(35 bytes)
()
08/28/2005 postreply
10:13:07
•
That's old news but debatable
-livefree-
♀
(457 bytes)
()
08/28/2005 postreply
16:50:56
•
比如我把车停在路上而我忘了锁车门,是不是每个人都可以进去玩?
-Grant-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
08/28/2005 postreply
10:19:10
•
why not? if it not driven
-away-
♀
(272 bytes)
()
08/28/2005 postreply
17:07:22
•
would be "thought" abandon
-Grant-
♂
(25 bytes)
()
08/28/2005 postreply
17:48:16
•
in some cities, people don't
-Grant-
♂
(80 bytes)
()
08/28/2005 postreply
17:49:38
•
楼上的"away"钻什么牛角尖啊,你以为你很聪明吗?
-其实你脑子进水了吧-
♀
(122 bytes)
()
08/31/2005 postreply
18:59:14