4 home ntwk, WPA still better?

来源: MoConfused 于 2005-01-13 12:21:15 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : (284 bytes)

My router supports both WEP and WPA, and from reading the manual it seems WPA is newer and better than WEP. I know no system is foolproof, but is WPA harder to crack/circumvent than WEP? Some WEP even supports 256-bit encryption, which sounds pretty impressive. Still easy to hack?

所有跟帖： 

• 回复：4 home ntwk, WPA still better? -瞎说几句- ♀ 给 瞎说几句 发送悄悄话 (403 bytes) () 01/13/2005 postreply 12:58:03

• Thanx! I remember when 128-bit -MoConfused- ♀ 给 MoConfused 发送悄悄话 (1141 bytes) () 01/13/2005 postreply 13:31:26

• 回复：Thanx! I remember when 128-bit -瞎说几句- ♀ 给 瞎说几句 发送悄悄话 (665 bytes) () 01/13/2005 postreply 14:12:39

• Yes, ROUTER往外就没用了, but that is -all_wired!- ♀ 给 all_wired! 发送悄悄话 (305 bytes) () 01/13/2005 postreply 15:07:07

• your comment is only partially --- ♀ 给 - 发送悄悄话 (306 bytes) () 01/13/2005 postreply 14:59:46

• BTW,你的ROUTER支持WPA与是否适合你的环境是两回事 -瞎说几句- ♀ 给 瞎说几句 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 01/13/2005 postreply 13:05:52

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！