My suggestion is don't think about wireless no matter what

来源: 德州老外 于 2006-08-05 19:29:07 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : (269 bytes)
回答: I will forget this cam forever. 由 德州老外 于 2006-08-05 19:18:49

Just because everybody can hijacking your wireless system. Juse use cable.

From security point of view, cable is the minimum reuqirement and it is cheap. If you want to use wireless, you have to use strong encryption scheme which normal users can't afford it.

所有跟帖： 

• not so bad, there are many cheap encryptic products -iamcaibird- ♂ 给 iamcaibird 发送悄悄话 iamcaibird 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 08/05/2006 postreply 19:33:43

• what's their key space? 64bit? 128bit? what encry scheme used? -德州老外- ♂ 给 德州老外 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 08/05/2006 postreply 20:22:16

• 当然额外的开支，额外的麻烦。技术上保守经济上的小器好 -iamcaibird- ♂ 给 iamcaibird 发送悄悄话 iamcaibird 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 08/05/2006 postreply 20:28:53

• I wonder if we can start a proj from here -德州老外- ♂ 给 德州老外 发送悄悄话 (100 bytes) () 08/05/2006 postreply 20:46:28

• I am still student in college but not far from you. For encrypti -iamcaibird- ♂ 给 iamcaibird 发送悄悄话 iamcaibird 的博客首页 (77 bytes) () 08/05/2006 postreply 21:04:18

• 米吐，but I won't consider DS chips. -德州老外- ♂ 给 德州老外 发送悄悄话 (211 bytes) () 08/05/2006 postreply 21:08:04

• DS1963S(SHA-1 64b), Java iButton(RSA 128b) are small size -iamcaibird- ♂ 给 iamcaibird 发送悄悄话 iamcaibird 的博客首页 (83 bytes) () 08/05/2006 postreply 21:10:58

• Sure, if you can implement encrytion in uP, that will be another -iamcaibird- ♂ 给 iamcaibird 发送悄悄话 iamcaibird 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 08/05/2006 postreply 21:19:05

• Those are hardware engine ready and MCS51 based at TI -德州老外- ♂ 给 德州老外 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 08/05/2006 postreply 21:30:46

• I have no interest on 51 family anymore -iamcaibird- ♂ 给 iamcaibird 发送悄悄话 iamcaibird 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 08/05/2006 postreply 21:42:36

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！