that is not the law

来源: caliber 于 2008-11-03 22:20:38 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : (550 bytes)
回答: another more realistic example 由 caliber 于 2008-11-03 15:42:52

the book is misleading. "accident and health insurance proceeds" in that list actually means "accident and health insurance benefits provided by your employer". Totally different from the proceeds from her own auto-insurance.

anyway, the end result may be that she would not need to pay tax on the insurance payment. so it doesn't matter in this case. I just don't agree with you that what you said is the rule that will govern every time. I know the principle of gross income, and it is more complicated than you said above.

所有跟帖： 

• 唉。IRS是对GROSS INCOME 征税的。如果你要弄清楚 -战车上的狸花- ♀ 给 战车上的狸花 发送悄悄话 (400 bytes) () 11/03/2008 postreply 23:09:04

• 我确实是为了较汁儿而较汁儿， 为了绞湖而绞湖 -caliber- ♂ 给 caliber 发送悄悄话 caliber 的博客首页 (591 bytes) () 11/04/2008 postreply 09:47:15

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！