that is not the law

来源: caliber 2008-11-03 22:20:38 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (550 bytes)
回答: another more realistic examplecaliber2008-11-03 15:42:52
the book is misleading. "accident and health insurance proceeds" in that list actually means "accident and health insurance benefits provided by your employer". Totally different from the proceeds from her own auto-insurance.

anyway, the end result may be that she would not need to pay tax on the insurance payment. so it doesn't matter in this case. I just don't agree with you that what you said is the rule that will govern every time. I know the principle of gross income, and it is more complicated than you said above.

所有跟帖: 

唉。IRS是对GROSS INCOME 征税的。如果你要弄清楚 -战车上的狸花- 给 战车上的狸花 发送悄悄话 (400 bytes) () 11/03/2008 postreply 23:09:04

我确实是为了较汁儿而较汁儿, 为了绞湖而绞湖 -caliber- 给 caliber 发送悄悄话 caliber 的博客首页 (591 bytes) () 11/04/2008 postreply 09:47:15

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”