回复：谢谢回答

Notice that I said she could easily prove the negligence case. Even if she does not have any cirsumstantial evidence, which should be included in the police report, such as skid marks, speed, etc., she could still raise res ipsa loquitur to prove the negligence case. Under res ipsa loquitur she needs to show that the accident would probably happen with negligence and you are probably the person culpable. That, however, does not mean she wins only means that the judge will permit the case to go further to jury. One way to attack this is, you can show evidence to prove you were using due care, such as watching the light, yielding her, stopping at the light, things as such. At that point, it would depend on the jury whom they believe. Credibility is very important.

Even if the jury believes in her, and that you were negligent, it still does not mean she wins the case, as she still has to prove the causation.