什么是网络毁誉:一顾客在网上批评加拿大酒店客房有臭虫被酒店索赔$95,000网络毁誉

来源: 潜水员大爷 2013-09-02 11:35:02 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (8638 bytes)

什么是网络毁誉:一顾客在网上批评加拿大酒店客房有臭虫被酒店索赔$95,000网络毁誉

一名酒店客户在加拿大一间酒店住宿,发现bed bugs,该客户抓住臭虫,拍照,然后去前台交涉,因当天酒店满员,酒店前台愿意给40,让顾客到邻近酒店入住,该客户决定待在该酒店过夜,事后,该客户 在网站tripadvisor.com上留下负面评价(包括照片),酒店要求此人撤回负评,但仍然告上法庭网络毁誉(defamation),索赔九万五 千美元.

顾客能不能在网络上自由地批评商家及个人的服务,有没有极限,什么是网络毁誉,加拿大这个标志性个案将对网络名誉保护和个人言论自由有非常意义。

https://therebel.org/society/686032-nightmare-hotel-sues-man-for-reporting-bed-bugs
This undated file photo provided by Orkin LLC shows bed bugs. THE CANADIAN PRESS/AP - Orkin LLC
http://o.canada.com/2013/08/23/quebec-hotel-sues-former-guest-over-online-review/
 

QUEBEC CITY — In what is believed to be a legal first in Canada — and a potential landmark case that could help to define the limits of free speech in cyberspace — a hotel is suing a former guest for $95,000 in damages over a review he wrote on the travel site TripAdvisor.

It also wants the negative review, which is still online, taken down.

But the lawyer for the Montreal man who wrote the review says the “frivolous” defamation lawsuit will be quashed in court like the bedbugs her client claims he found in his room.

That’s not how the hotel sees it.

“Cleanliness is the name of the game in the hotel business,” said Quebec City lawyer William Noonan, who filed the motion in Quebec Superior Court here last month on behalf of l’Hôtel Québec.

“Hotel owners can’t be upset with someone who doesn’t like their service. But when people start yelling ‘Bedbugs!’ they’d better have proof.”

According to the motion, Montreal building contractor Laurent Azoulay checked into l’Hôtel Québec in the Quebec City suburb of Sainte-Foy on April 26 for a two-night stay with his son, who was playing in an atom hockey tournament.

The 204-room, four-star property is one of seven in the local Hôtels Jaro chain, which is owned by area businessman Jacques Robitaille.

“During the (first) night,” reads the motion, “the defendant claims to have discovered in his room a scourge for hotels around the world — bedbugs.”

The hotel, it adds, was unable to give Azoulay another room because it was fully booked that night.

It says Azoulay also refused to go to another of the chain’s hotels nearby (wanting to remain in the same hotel as his son’s hockey team) and returned to his room for the night.

The next morning, a Saturday, Azoulay allegedly insisted on meeting Robitaille to discuss the situation.

When that didn’t happen, he checked out of the hotel and threatened to write a bad review about the property on TripAdvisor.

Later that day, Azoulay posted a review on TripAdvisor about what he termed his “nightmare” stay at l’Hôtel Québec.

“At first this hotel looks okay,” it reads, “until you wake at 3AM (sic) because you’ve been scratching all over and realize your bed is infested with BED BUGS!”

Azoulay goes on to recount his version of events before issuing this warning:

“Beware of BED BUGS! If you are looking for a scratch-free night sleep, stay elsewhere, you will be doing you and your loved ones a favour! Trust me … and that’s why the Internet is a great tool!”

The review has received 176 votes from readers as being “helpful.”

It is also one of 16 “Terrible” reviews of l’Hôtel Québec on TripAdvisor, which ranks the hotel 62nd among 99 area hotels.

Azoulay’s review, however, is the only one that mentions bedbugs.

According to Noonan, the hotel decided to sue when Azoulay refused repeated requests for him to return to Quebec City and meet with Robitaille to resolve the issue.

“He made this big fuss and then he thinks he can just walk away,” Noonan told The Gazette. “But his actions have hurt the hotel a lot. We’ve had numerous people call and tell us they weren’t staying because of it, and cancel reservations.”

Noonan notably questioned Azoulay’s claim about bedbugs.

“There are 204 rooms in that hotel and it had never had a single complaint about bedbugs before that night,” he said. “If there were some there — and in his room only — how did they get there and where did they go?”

Noonan said he hasn’t heard of similar cases in Quebec or Canada.

However, a hotel in Illinois sued a Massachusetts couple for what it said was a false bedbug claim on TripAdvisor.com.

That case is still before the courts.

Though she refused to discuss details, Azoulay’s lawyer, Muriel Librati, said her client intends to fight the case, which is expected to be heard here in early December.

“The way he’s been treated is deplorable,” the Westmount lawyer said. “They are insisting my client put bedbugs in his room and that he is just trying to get money from them.”

Azoulay, she added, has pictures of bedbug bites on him and his son, as well as a video showing several bedbugs they caught and put in a glass before killing them.

“This case is frivolous,” Librati said. “TripAdvisor is an open forum for people to post reviews. Suing over a negative one is a perfect example of libel chill.”

Philippe Viel agrees.

“The court system is too complex, long and expensive as a recourse for an individual consumer who has suffered an injustice,” said Viel, director of communications for the Union des Consommateurs, a Montreal-based federation of 11 Quebec consumer protection groups.

Sites like TripAdvisor, he added, help to level the playing field.

“They give consumers more power by providing them with a fast, easy and free way to express their frustration and to get a company’s attention (and) hopefully get satisfaction,” Viel said.

The problem with online discussion groups and forums like TripAdvisor, he added, is the lack of control over the veracity of reviews.

“Like political parties do with blogs and opinion pieces, many businesses are now hiring people to write glowing reviews about them — or bad ones about their competitors,” Viel said.

He urged travellers to be cautious in regards to online reviews, and rely instead on travel professionals and travel guides for more accurate information.

Danielle Lefrançois, the communications manager in the Montreal office of Advertising Standards Canada, echoed that warning.

“The use of supposedly neutral blogs and forums on the Internet to promote goods and services is a big problem,” Lefrançois said.

She added that her group, a self-regulatory body run by the advertising industry that investigates complaints about the veracity of claims and testimonials on corporate websites, has never received any complaints about online review sites like TripAdvisor.

But she advises consumers to be wary when consulting them.

“Even honest reviews reflect individual opinion,” she said. “And people sometimes have unrealistic expectations and are easily disappointed.”



"In what is believed to be a legal first in Canada — and a potential landmark case that could help to define the limits of free speech in cyberspace — a hotel is suing a former guest for $95,000 in damages over a review he wrote on the travel site TripAdvisor.

It also wants the negative review, which is still online, taken down.

But the lawyer for the Montreal man who wrote the review says the "frivolous" defamation lawsuit will be quashed in court like the bedbugs her client claims he found in his room."*

所有跟帖: 

这不是还没有判么?判了再来说谁赢啊 -MICKEY222- 给 MICKEY222 发送悄悄话 MICKEY222 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 09/02/2013 postreply 11:39:10

从前后事端看很有可能是PB所为 -golflover- 给 golflover 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 09/02/2013 postreply 11:47:15

马塞储塞(MA)的另一各案子现在也是进行时,酒店告客户从他处搬来臭虫索钱。 -潜水员大爷- 给 潜水员大爷 发送悄悄话 潜水员大爷 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 09/02/2013 postreply 11:59:31

如果是客户搬来的臭虫,自然是客户的错。但如果是酒店本身就有,就是酒店的问题拉,看谁有证据拉 -MICKEY222- 给 MICKEY222 发送悄悄话 MICKEY222 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 09/02/2013 postreply 12:02:27

如果酒店有证据证明确是客户从他处搬来臭虫索钱,客人应该被重罚甚至坐牢 -剪刀手- 给 剪刀手 发送悄悄话 剪刀手 的博客首页 (28 bytes) () 09/02/2013 postreply 12:03:06

这个就是难点:如何证明臭虫是酒店的?当年WENDY‘s的老鼠案,最后是法医解破老鼠,确定老鼠内藏没有sauce,才击败原告(把老 -潜水员大爷- 给 潜水员大爷 发送悄悄话 潜水员大爷 的博客首页 (151 bytes) () 09/02/2013 postreply 12:09:15

觉得这个是真的,最终会庭外和解。旅店赔些钱了事。 -Déjàvu116- 给 Déjàvu116 发送悄悄话 Déjàvu116 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 09/02/2013 postreply 14:41:46

可以清查那个房间,有bug但是没有虫卵就是顾客放进来的。如果都有卵了,就是原来就有的 -10things- 给 10things 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 09/02/2013 postreply 17:38:52

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”