China GDP vs. US GDP

In 2011, US GDP was $15.1T and China GDP was $7.3T. Assuming US continuously grows at annual rate of 2% and China at 7%, it would take China for 15 years to catch up. However, there are 2 big variables:

1. Can China grow at annual rate of 7% each year in the next 15 years. It was easier from $1,000 per capita but would be a challenge when it started around $5,000 per capita in 2011. This phenomenon occured in many developing countries. Korea and Taiwan are only two economies with population over 20M which have enjoyed sustained growth for more than 2 decades after reaching $5,000 threshold;

2. RMB appreciation. If RMB appreciates vs. USD, it will take shorter for China to catch up. But RMB appreciation will dampen exports, which will make 7% growth much less likely.

From the trend in last 2 years, it seems capital are moving out of China. Thus, I am not so optimistic about growth potential in China. 

 

-----

2011 rate 5 10 15
US 15.1 2.0% 16.7 18.4 20.3
China 7.3 7.0% 10.2 14.4 20.1

所有跟帖: 

not as much as China. FYI -sleepdonkey- 给 sleepdonkey 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 09:06:41

here it is, take a look by yourself, , -sleepdonkey- 给 sleepdonkey 发送悄悄话 (338 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 09:14:25

货币增发量/每年。 你这个都看不懂还敢讲, 有你的。 -sleepdonkey- 给 sleepdonkey 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 09:20:00

He can't read anything other than Chinese -mknc- 给 mknc 发送悄悄话 mknc 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 09:22:49

图标上不是有吗?, bloomberg的数据,。要不你也去弄一个数据? -sleepdonkey- 给 sleepdonkey 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 09:29:14

To make the matter worse, China keeps buying US treasury bills, -Warsteiner- 给 Warsteiner 发送悄悄话 Warsteiner 的博客首页 (95 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 09:25:04

唉, 看不懂你们吵啥。 -sleepdonkey- 给 sleepdonkey 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 09:23:02

1949? -mknc- 给 mknc 发送悄悄话 mknc 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 09:23:42

最井底蛙的 -野生动物摄影家- 给 野生动物摄影家 发送悄悄话 野生动物摄影家 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 11:39:20

GDP is not too meaningful. -pieq314- 给 pieq314 发送悄悄话 pieq314 的博客首页 (328 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 09:13:02

What about making it up China GDP growth at 70% per annum -Cherrylover- 给 Cherrylover 发送悄悄话 (173 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 09:19:20

回复:China GDP vs. US GDP -pieq314- 给 pieq314 发送悄悄话 pieq314 的博客首页 (835 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 09:19:29

哈哈,很形像。美国的GDP大部分都是这种吃狗屎的,叫做SERVICES -相对强度- 给 相对强度 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 09:24:24

看来你的理解力有限呀 -pieq314- 给 pieq314 发送悄悄话 pieq314 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 09:28:44

It's easy. Just cook the book. haha. -999朵玫瑰- 给 999朵玫瑰 发送悄悄话 999朵玫瑰 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 09:31:10

在全球化时代,跨国公司全球经营,统计一国的GDP并不反映该国的强弱 -虎落平原- 给 虎落平原 发送悄悄话 虎落平原 的博客首页 (359 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 09:37:20

就目前来说,中国的航母并没有战略价值。具强大攻防能力的航母群才有战斗力。 -虎落平原- 给 虎落平原 发送悄悄话 虎落平原 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 09:54:49

Every single developed country has service taking 65%+ of GDP. -Warsteiner- 给 Warsteiner 发送悄悄话 Warsteiner 的博客首页 (160 bytes) () 11/26/2012 postreply 09:55:30

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!