Because they value lives more, and there is no "严打"

来源: Warsteiner 于 2009-08-18 09:05:52 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : (10 bytes)
本帖于 2009-10-13 19:35:38 时间, 由超管 论坛管理 编辑

in Canada.

所有跟帖： 

• no "严打" will cause mroe crimes which is unfair to innocent -rockstar- ♂ 给 rockstar 发送悄悄话 rockstar 的博客首页 (93 bytes) () 08/18/2009 postreply 09:10:28

• "严打" executed thieves for stealing bicycles, no more stealing -Warsteiner- ♂ 给 Warsteiner 发送悄悄话 Warsteiner 的博客首页 (48 bytes) () 08/18/2009 postreply 09:15:24

• too extreme. 严打" put thieves in prison, less stealing. -rockstar- ♂ 给 rockstar 发送悄悄话 rockstar 的博客首页 (79 bytes) () 08/18/2009 postreply 09:35:22

• no 严打 release thieves out to the street, more stealing. -rockstar- ♂ 给 rockstar 发送悄悄话 rockstar 的博客首页 (77 bytes) () 08/18/2009 postreply 09:37:25

• "严打"类似于美国的 ”three strikes laws“ -goodcitizen- ♂ 给 goodcitizen 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 08/18/2009 postreply 09:19:54

• Please elaborate? how? what? -Warsteiner- ♂ 给 Warsteiner 发送悄悄话 Warsteiner 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 08/18/2009 postreply 09:24:15

• Wikipedia 上有很多例子 （附网址） -goodcitizen- ♂ 给 goodcitizen 发送悄悄话 (46 bytes) () 08/18/2009 postreply 09:43:25

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！