这里有些人可能是有别的目的

首先看一下报道：
Today, the President released his 2014 federal income tax returns. He and the First Lady filed their income tax returns jointly and reported adjusted gross income of $477,383. The Obamas paid $93,362 in total tax.

“The President and First Lady also reported donating $70,712 – or about 14.8 percent of their adjusted gross income – to 33 different charities. The largest reported gift to charity was $22,012 to the Fisher House Foundation. The President’s effective federal income tax rate is 19.6 percent.” 来自https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2015/04/10/president-obama-and-vice-president-biden-s-2014-tax-returns

有人试图混淆的是调节后的毛收入，和可征税的收入。

美国财务方面有数不清的高手，这种公开发表的东西，如果有问题的话，早就已经沸沸扬扬了。

所有跟帖： 

• 我用的是TAX/AGI，这是个贯常的作法，几乎大家都用总收入和所交的税相比，每个人抵税额因人不同，几乎无法相比。这个TAX/AG -FL棉农- ♂ (0 bytes) () 07/01/2015 postreply 18:30:56

• 关于谁别有用心，那你可是在讲版主，他登的，我就是议论，和我有个P关系。版主咋意思你最好找他理论。 -FL棉农- ♂ (195 bytes) () 07/01/2015 postreply 18:33:21

• 你下面写得清清楚楚是“可征税收入” -Wjin2002- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/01/2015 postreply 18:35:01

• 所有人都用同一个相同对应数字，无区别，一律平等。TAX/AGI -FL棉农- ♂ (6 bytes) () 07/01/2015 postreply 18:36:51

• 另外，这原话照抄版主的话，一字不改。 -FL棉农- ♂ (0 bytes) () 07/01/2015 postreply 18:39:07

• 到底是“我用的TAX/AGI”,还是“原话照抄版主的话”？说谎还是蛮难的。 -Wjin2002- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/01/2015 postreply 19:13:34

• 小编，混人讲你在撒谎，NND,灭了他。 -FL棉农- ♂ (0 bytes) () 07/01/2015 postreply 19:19:24