无罪推证不是每个地方都这样,

美国法律是无罪推定，举证责任在控告方，他不可能仅根据你的车型号，牌照号就打赢官司。那样的话我随便在大街上找辆车把这些记下来就可以告任何人了。他必须提供其他证明。如果他没有任何其他证明，你不用提供任何证明就赢了。如果他有其他证明，你只需要证明他的证明是假的就可以了。你最好的证明就是你不在现场的证明，如果你能想起来你那天那个时间在干什么，并有证人或证据，你肯定没事。

我给你COPY份网上一个律师对费城TRAFFIC COURT的COMMENT.
2009-11-06 17:50:50: A terrible court. A complete violation of due process rights. You have to prove a defendant committed a traffic violation. The judge cannot simply read ticket and say guilty. I am an attorney who was recently in traffic court and was very upset to see how so many individuals due process rights are violated. You have to prove speeding, show devices were approved by the department of transportation, that devices were tested and validated, etc. This court did not want or due any of this. I surely hope someone looks into this process.

另外我的律师也说十有八九会输, 只能走上诉一条路.

法律咨询版的老猫也研究个那7个法官的判决习惯,同样说我的案子胜算很小.

在很多地方, 只要开TICKET的警察不出庭, 被告就赢. 但费城不行. 照输不误. 别的很多地方是ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY来起诉, 费城是警察是指控人.然后法官就SIMPLY SAY GUILTY. 我在MITBBS费城版也发了贴统计大家有人或是知道别人赢过交通案件吗. 没一个人说赢过. 只有一个人回贴说法庭就是挣你钱的. 最好的情况是WAIVE掉你的POINT, 但你的钱还是STAY.