There is a big difference here

来源: 偶尔浮一下 2010-04-07 10:47:42 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (571 bytes)
If a manufacturer purposely remove parts from a group of cars while they are still functioning and working properly and use them for repairs of other cars, do you assume that there is any need for refurbishing rather than recycling these as is? In comparison, BMW recycles only 5% of its parts only when certain defects are found and they have to been completely refurbished before getting into the repair shops. The only explanation that can be drawn here is why the Japanese parts are cheaper is because apparently more used parts are being circulated in their cars.

所有跟帖: 

i agree with this. you get what you paid for -用户名被占用了- 给 用户名被占用了 发送悄悄话 用户名被占用了 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 04/07/2010 postreply 10:51:42

No,you are getting nothing for what you paid for -偶尔浮一下- 给 偶尔浮一下 发送悄悄话 (404 bytes) () 04/07/2010 postreply 13:22:38

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”