I personally prefer mechanical sytem.

来源: wolfmanii 于 2010-02-22 10:09:46 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : (524 bytes)
回答: Brake Override的背后 由 Lyedge 于 2010-02-21 14:05:16

Leaving too much stuff controlled by computer always bothers me.

Germain made vehicles are notorious in this area. If everything works, it is a beauty. But if one thing is wrong, who knows how many sensor/computer chips need to be checked/replaced?

I would reather keep the critical part, such
as brake, accelerator control depends on mechnical
system (direct control), than outsource it to a computer deciding my life.

But with the current trend in auto industry. I don't think it will happen.

所有跟帖： 

• I second you on this point -biglow- ♂ 给 biglow 发送悄悄话 biglow 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 02/22/2010 postreply 10:29:00

• Cool :) -wolfmanii- ♂ 给 wolfmanii 发送悄悄话 wolfmanii 的博客首页 (587 bytes) () 02/22/2010 postreply 10:47:26

• 我也倾向机械控制，简单可靠 -TBz- ♂ 给 TBz 发送悄悄话 TBz 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 02/22/2010 postreply 11:30:23

• 成本低，易于维护。 -TBz- ♂ 给 TBz 发送悄悄话 TBz 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 02/22/2010 postreply 11:38:24

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！