First, a disclaimer: I'm rusty at physics, even in its most elementary form. But I'll attempt to write down equations, solve them, and explain the results.
Let's assume that two vehicles, of mass m1 and m2, moving towards each other at velocities v1 and v2 (without loss of generality, v1>0, v2
The outcome of this collision is governed by two conservation laws:
1. Kinegic energy is conserved. Thus
0.5*m1*u1*u1 + 0.5*m2*u2*u2 = g * (0.5*m1*v1*v1 + 0.5*m2*v2*v2),
2. Momentum is conserved. Thus
m1*u1 + m2*u2 = m1*v1 + m2*v2.
This set of quadratic equations produce two sets of solutions, one of which under g=1 leads to u1=v1 and u2=v2 (in other words, no collision) and should be discarded. The valid solution can easily be obtained on say Mathematica, and I won't bother to list it here. For the ensuing discussion, it doesn't matter.
力学分析重车撞轻车
所有跟帖:
•
回复:力学分析重车撞轻车
-Nonsense-
♀
(120 bytes)
()
03/02/2005 postreply
14:04:15
•
That's in the coefficient g.
-Bonbon330S-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
03/02/2005 postreply
14:07:03
•
u probably misunderstood his
-x-boxer-
♀
(308 bytes)
()
03/02/2005 postreply
14:12:55
•
That's addressed in part 3.
-Bonbon330S-
♂
(71 bytes)
()
03/02/2005 postreply
14:14:19
•
I once chatted with a friend
-x-boxer-
♀
(511 bytes)
()
03/02/2005 postreply
14:33:02
•
Also, the steering column
-Bonbon330S-
♂
(81 bytes)
()
03/02/2005 postreply
14:48:00
•
力学分析重车撞轻车 (2)
-Bonbon330S-
♂
(899 bytes)
()
03/02/2005 postreply
14:06:40
•
力学分析重车撞轻车 (3)
-Bonbon330S-
♂
(1159 bytes)
()
03/02/2005 postreply
14:13:13
•
力学分析重车撞轻车 (4)
-Bonbon330S-
♂
(400 bytes)
()
03/02/2005 postreply
14:28:21
•
怎么标题是中文,结果进去了是英文啊?
-我的英语太差了-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
03/02/2005 postreply
17:04:18
•
English title wouldn't fit :)
-Bonbon330S-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
03/02/2005 postreply
17:08:32
•
Nice talk and formulas
-funnycars-
♀
(202 bytes)
()
03/02/2005 postreply
18:39:17
•
They have diff. objective.
-Bonbon330S-
♂
(687 bytes)
()
03/02/2005 postreply
18:54:49
•
露分析了一个问题
-露分析了一个问题-
♀
(102 bytes)
()
03/02/2005 postreply
20:22:16
•
It's exactly the opposite.
-Bonbon330S-
♂
(644 bytes)
()
03/03/2005 postreply
05:21:30
•
that is what i say
-thatiswh-
♀
(40 bytes)
()
03/03/2005 postreply
06:16:34
•
Hehe, sorry I scanned your
-Bonbon330S-
♂
(295 bytes)
()
03/03/2005 postreply
06:35:51
•
Energy is not conserved!!
-3.14159-
♂
(354 bytes)
()
03/03/2005 postreply
10:34:42
•
The formula has a damping coef
-Bonbon330S-
♂
(166 bytes)
()
03/03/2005 postreply
10:53:09