MIT engr rep 4.9/5.0 (highest in US), Sloan rep 4.6/5.0. Penn En

Penn engr 3.7/5.0,  Wharton 4.8/5.0.  (The difference of Wharton & Sloan is small, but the difference of engr rep and overall school rep is larger).

So MIT with Sloan > Penn M&T.  Very simple math.

Plus, you would recognize a MIT kid as "graduated from MIT".

M&T students will be recognized as either "he is from Penn", or "he is from Wharton".  (Most likely he will be known as a Wharton kid). Nobody outside the circle cares about M&T.

Not saying Wharton kid is not a great title (it definitely is), but MIT kid is at genius level  

Of course in finance world, the Wharton name is as strong as H or MIT(or even slightly better), but in general terms, MIT still wins by a good margin.

I know at least two kids picked S, M over M&T.

Both schools can get a kid to a great career path though (little difference there).

所有跟帖： 

• 这个回答，爱了 --久九-- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/09/2021 postreply 13:28:10

• 挑花眼时勿忘初心，有领导船在mit 更容易stand out -芝麻街的小不点- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/09/2021 postreply 15:18:13

• 是的！ --久九-- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/09/2021 postreply 15:58:22

• 金融界MIT怎么能跟Wharton相提并论，这是舞蹈 -tibuko- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/09/2021 postreply 13:40:00

• 你俩说的都对 --久九-- ♀ (275 bytes) () 04/09/2021 postreply 14:56:50

• 恭喜牛娃， MIT CS+Sloan 吧，不过如游泳的话，课程压力会大点 -iGarage- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/09/2021 postreply 18:12:43

• beach lover 是明白人! 出了金融圈子, MIT carries much more weight -solarwind00- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/09/2021 postreply 13:50:00