对Scotus的dodge这么理解

这个是抄来的

“The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot. Statement of Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas joins: In my view, we do not have discretion to deny the filing of a bill of complaint in a case that falls within our original jurisdiction. See Arizona v. California, 589 U. S. ___ (Feb. 24, 2020) (Thomas, J., dissenting). I would therefore grant the motion to file the bill of complaint but would not grant other relief, and I express no view on any other issue.

In a nut case, SCOTUS rejected the TX case because TX filed their case as "motion for leave to file a bill of complaint". However, SCOTUS signals to TX and other states that if they file their cases as "motion to file the bill of complaint", then their cases will be heard. 

 

所有跟帖： 

• Powell律师和Lin律师都有专门摇摆州的案子到高法了，但不知道什么时候会有回复 -罗小天- ♀ (119 bytes) () 12/12/2020 postreply 08:27:00

• 法律程序走过场必须的。大法官也是 -Xingfujiaren- ♀ (142 bytes) () 12/12/2020 postreply 08:53:14