A+(-A)=0, what for? As for protection,

来源: Labourse 2019-10-27 10:17:18 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 0 次 (557 bytes)

As for protection, holding a security is for the final exiting price.

- Turbulances en route to destination are irrelevant. Why care about price en route, and why need protection?

- Or, if destination is uncertain, why need to pick the security to begin with?

- Or, if one needs small drawdown as required by high leverage, protection may be needed to avoid being wiped out. But the protection comes at a price, which defeats the original purpose of high leverage. So why use high leverage to begin with?

所有跟帖: 

你看偶的贴是说保护,你一下子就把它推到极致。 -buydip?- 给 buydip? 发送悄悄话 buydip? 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 10/27/2019 postreply 11:06:28

正好我也想探讨一下这个话题,干脆就全部提出我的理解;欢迎探讨 -Labourse- 给 Labourse 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/27/2019 postreply 11:15:24

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”