唉,我苦口婆心说了几次了,再说一句,我也要干正事了。

这个Title VI 叫 cause of action. 你挺赞赏 Kavanaugh,因为你喜欢他是个originalist, Title VI 写得清清楚楚:

42 U.S. Code § 2000d - Prohibition against exclusion from participation in, denial of benefits of, and discrimination under federally assisted programs on ground of race, color, or national origin

No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.

如果谁不喜欢这个法律,那就去lobby congress to change the law.  你主张的“私校可以不受联邦政府管制” 正是你最反对的 legislation from the bench. 明白?


至于你的”Gratz v. Bollinger 其实只适用在密西根大学这种公校“,你应该学学 constitutional law jurisprudence. A good place to start will be Gratz v. Bollinger.  网上找找那个案子的SCOTUS opinion。也会回答statute 和宪法的关系。

 

所有跟帖: 

谢谢分享 -成功的兔- 给 成功的兔 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/10/2018 postreply 06:49:49

谢谢! -GoGym- 给 GoGym 发送悄悄话 GoGym 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 10/10/2018 postreply 06:52:24

赞! 谢解惑。对这些专业的东西,最忌讳有人以专业的口吻乱说,害人最深。甩了一堆名词术语之后, -N.- 给 N. 发送悄悄话 N. 的博客首页 (86 bytes) () 10/10/2018 postreply 08:20:30

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!