The point is, at this level, it's more about the student

来源: beachlver 于 2017-04-26 14:16:35 [档案] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : 0 (709 bytes)

本帖于 2017-04-26 14:36:09 时间, 由普通用户 beachlver 编辑

回答: 那一定的。UCB数学major CS minor，FLAG 之类强候选人。好公司做比brown名气要好吧，又省大把学费。由乒乓板于 2017-04-26 14:05:05

not about the school.

If the student is equally good, Brown can send the student wherever UCB can send, and probably even more options (beyond STEM). Brown sends far higher percentage of graduates to top medical, law and business schools than UCB (for example, medical school admission rate at Brown is ~85%, at UCB is 50-55%; national average is ~40%).

The best UCB students (at pretty much HYPSM level) are likely better than the best Brown students.

However, the average UCB student is lower than average Brown student.

There is like 150-200 points difference for average SAT. That does not mean everything but it does mean something

您的位置：文学城 » 论坛 » 子女教育 » The point is, at this level, it's more about the student

所有跟帖：

• 如果将来读医法商，当然选brown, 但是本科学数学的绝大多数不读医法商。另外UCB SAT分低的学生是文科生，不是数学生。 -swj2000- ♀ (202 bytes) () 04/26/2017 postreply 14:34:33

• brown 比较前几年因为藤校大量的marketing 学生质量是比以前好些。但是overall brown的学生去 -乒乓板- ♀ (1052 bytes) () 04/26/2017 postreply 15:02:59

• 要看有多少的机会在统计学上光看%在不同总量下常常是没有意义的，还需要其他的统计数字特征来说明问题。简单说， -乒乓板- ♀ (325 bytes) () 04/26/2017 postreply 15:20:54

• 请问你为什么要去那个50/100的group?除了花钱少以外 -99月光- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/26/2017 postreply 15:35:43

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！