陪审团要决定的是那方的证据更信服人。 下面是控辩双方的观点:

A source inside the courtroom confirmed that the jury asked to see the gun used to shoot Steinle. Zarate and his defense team maintained the argument that the suspect found the stolen weapon on the pier that day and it "just fired."

The gun belonged to a federal Bureau of Land Management ranger and was stolen from his parked car a week earlier.

The bullet ricocheted on the pier's concrete walkway before it struck Steinle, killing her. Zarate has admitted to shooting Steinle, but says it was an accident.

However, the prosecution painted a very different picture, telling jurors that Zarate deliberately shot the gun towards Steinle while "playing his own secret version of Russian roulette."

所有跟帖： 

• 专业人士做的专业的局，忽悠观众们。。。 -darkrifle- ♂ (0 bytes) () 11/30/2017 postreply 19:31:50

• 你要是老拿conspiracy 来看问题，那我们不在一个频道上 -voiceofme- ♂ (0 bytes) () 11/30/2017 postreply 19:33:40

• 那位华裔警察也是子弹从墙上反射打死人，怎么就有罪了。 -相对强度- ♂ (0 bytes) () 11/30/2017 postreply 20:09:41

• 得看是什么罪。 -voiceofme- ♂ (322 bytes) () 11/30/2017 postreply 20:22:22

• 这个你要问法律专业人士，本来的控罪不成立是不是可以自动降级成立？ -davidhu1999- ♂ (0 bytes) () 12/01/2017 postreply 06:39:06