1. Clinton fundation received a grade A from charity watch

来源: SwiperTheFox 2016-11-04 12:19:28 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 0 次 (1465 bytes)
本文内容已被 [ SwiperTheFox ] 在 2016-11-04 12:28:23 编辑过。如有问题,请报告版主或论坛管理删除.

meaning that they have been doing a pretty good job comparing to other charities as a whole.

2. If waste is a widespread concern, it is not the problem of Clinton foundation specifically.  We do need to address the problem, but not necessarily focus on one foundation, who is relatively much better than others.

Actually we know that Trump foundation broke laws in several cases and received fines.

3. Clinton foundation's function is to link donor with charity org.    Not saying the foundation has or has not done due diligence in checking those charity orgs.  It is difficult if not impossible to not make any mistake--if there were mistakes, given the size of the foundation.  Have you answered the following  basic questions in order?
a. Did some charity org did bad things?

b. if a is true, did they receive money from Clinton Foundation?

c. if b is true, did Clinton foundation know it?

d. if b is false, did Clinton proactively take actions to prevent it.

e.  if c is true, did Clinton foundation take actions to prevent and correct it?

f.  If e is true, did Clinton foudnation deliberately do it?

g. if f is true, was Clinton involved?

h. if g is true, was Clinton herself (knowlingly) involved?

 

 

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”