meaning that they have been doing a pretty good job comparing to other charities as a whole.
2. If waste is a widespread concern, it is not the problem of Clinton foundation specifically. We do need to address the problem, but not necessarily focus on one foundation, who is relatively much better than others.
Actually we know that Trump foundation broke laws in several cases and received fines.
3. Clinton foundation's function is to link donor with charity org. Not saying the foundation has or has not done due diligence in checking those charity orgs. It is difficult if not impossible to not make any mistake--if there were mistakes, given the size of the foundation. Have you answered the following basic questions in order?
a. Did some charity org did bad things?
b. if a is true, did they receive money from Clinton Foundation?
c. if b is true, did Clinton foundation know it?
d. if b is false, did Clinton proactively take actions to prevent it.
e. if c is true, did Clinton foundation take actions to prevent and correct it?
f. If e is true, did Clinton foudnation deliberately do it?
g. if f is true, was Clinton involved?
h. if g is true, was Clinton herself (knowlingly) involved?