亚裔细分限制华裔子女升学就业，谁干的？！

来源: 五洲闲话于 2016-10-16 17:53:15 [档案] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读：次 (21320 bytes)

本文内容已被 [ 五洲闲话 ] 在 2016-10-19 05:59:21 编辑过。如有问题，请报告版主或论坛管理删除.

谁是我们的敌人，谁是我们的朋友？这个问题是爬藤的首要问题。

Vote: CA Senate 3rd Reading SCA5 Hernandez Yea: 27 Nay: 9 NV: 3 Absent: 0

(https://legiscan.com/CA/rollcall/SCA5/id/313934)

Name	Yea	Nay	Not Voting
Sen. Joel Anderson [R]		X
Sen. Jim Beall [D]	X
Sen. Tom Berryhill [R]		X
Sen. Marty Block [D]	X
Sen. Ronald Calderon [D]	X
Sen. Anthony Cannella [R]			X
Sen. Ellen Corbett [D]	X
Sen. Lou Correa [D]	X
Sen. Kevin de Leon [D]	X
Sen. Mark DeSaulnier [D]	X
Sen. Noreen Evans [D]	X
Sen. Jean Fuller [R]		X
Sen. Ted Gaines [R]		X
Sen. Cathleen Galgiani [D]	X
Sen. Loni Hancock [D]	X
Sen. Edward Hernandez [D]	X
Sen. Jerry Hill [D]	X
Sen. Benjamin Hueso [D]	X
Sen. Robert Huff [R]		X
Sen. Hannah-Beth Jackson [D]	X
Sen. Steve Knight [R]		X
Sen. Ricardo Lara [D]	X
Sen. Mark Leno [D]	X
Sen. Ted Lieu [D]	X
Sen. Carol Liu [D]	X
Sen. Holly Mitchell [D]	X
Sen. William Monning [D]	X
Sen. Jim Nielsen [R]			X
Sen. Alex Padilla [D]	X
Sen. Fran Pavley [D]	X
Sen. Richard Roth [D]	X
Sen. Darrell Steinberg [D]	X
Sen. Norma Torres [D]	X
Sen. Andy Vidak [R]		X
Sen. Mimi Walters [R]		X
Sen. Lois Wolk [D]	X
Sen. Roderick Wright [D]			X
Sen. Mark Wyland [R]		X
Sen. Leland Yee [D]	X

=================================

看看那些加州SCA5案中令人作呕的华人政客

加州大学前校董李心培表示，关于学校招生中存在的种族比例问题早在20年前就存在争议。这次SCA5提案投票中，加州三位华裔参议员均投了赞成票，这让身为李心培很不能理解。他称，亚裔民众推选他们出来，就是希望他们能够在关键时刻维护亚裔居民的权利，保护我们的利益。而这次提案的投票中，他们非但没有保护亚裔居民，反而倒向另一边，支持减招亚裔学生。无论他们抱有什么政治目的，都不能以牺牲亚裔居民的利益作为交换。

    ---------------------------------------

    加州参议院1月30日以27票赞成对9票反对通过了SCA5提案。该提案称，目前加州大学系统中的亚裔学生比例过高，要求限制亚裔学生入学比例，提高非裔和拉美裔的入学率。SCA5提案将于近日被提到加州众议会再次投票。如果众议会投票通过，SCA5法案将于今年11月举行公投，最终决定是否恢复在加州大学系统中实行所谓的入学种族平等方案。

    SCA5 是由民主党州参议员贺南德兹（Ed Hrnandz）提出的一项法案。加州曾于1996年通过209法案，禁止公立大学以种族决定入学，政府也不可以根据种族制定聘用标准。参议院通过的SCA5 提案将取消209 法案的部分规定，包括政府部门不能因为个人和团体的种族、性别、肤色和原籍国给予公立教育的特殊待遇。

    据美联社报道称，今年加州大学系统中，白人和亚裔学生占大学新生的主要比例，非裔和拉美裔学生人数显现出代表性不足。今年加州大学系统的录取新生中，36%为亚裔、28.1%为白人、27.6%为拉美裔、4.2%为非裔学生。种族录取比例的悬殊在加州大学伯克利分校和洛杉矶分校尤为明显。

    提案在州参院获得通过消息传开，在湾区亚裔社区引起强烈反响。许多亚裔网友认为，加州大学系统中，亚裔学生比例高是因为亚裔学生学习成绩和各方面的表现出色，他们是凭真本事被大学录取，并没有因为族裔背景而受到特殊照顾。一旦提案公投通过，加州公立大学亚裔学生比例将从现在的40%下降到15%，那么亚裔孩子在大学中势必受到排挤。

    加州大学前校董李心培表示，关于学校招生中存在的种族比例问题早在20年前就存在争议。这次SCA5提案投票中，加州三位华裔参议员均投了赞成票，这让身为李心培很不能理解。他称，亚裔民众推选他们出来，就是希望他们能够在关键时刻维护亚裔居民的权利，保护我们的利益。而这次提案的投票中，他们非但没有保护亚裔居民，反而倒向另一边，支持减招亚裔学生。无论他们抱有什么政治目的，都不能以牺牲亚裔居民的利益作为交换。

    李心培认为，学校录取是学生自身实力和学习能力所决定的。加州大学内，亚裔学生比例高是因为亚裔学生确实表现出众，不是种族歧视的表现。李心培相信，SCA5提案在公投中必定会被民众所否决。

    SCA5提案受到加州亚裔父母的格外关注。日前，亚裔民间组织在网络上组织了反对SCA5提案的在线签名，希望以此游说加州民主党议员们向SCA5投反对或弃权票。

GOP Opposes SCA5

SCA 5 would allow the State of California to deny an individual or group’s rights to public education on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin. Click on the image to the right and Read the Bill!

History

Edward Hernandez has been trying to revise Prop. 209 since he was a member of the State Assembly. He introduced Assembly Bill 2047 in 2010 to enable discrimination in our post-secondary schools. Democrats completely backed him and Republicans opposed. View the party-line votes. Thankfully, Governor Schwarzenegger vetoed it. As a Senator, in 2011, Hernandez introduced a similar measure (SB 185) that passed out of the Senate on a Party-Line vote with Democrats supporting and Republicans opposing admittance to college based on race rather than merit. This Constitutional Amendment (SCA 5) not only would have enabled discrimination in our colleges, but at ALL levels of education. The bill was ultimately vetoed by Governor Brown, not because he opposed the concept, but because the issue was under consideration in the courts. Brown's veto message below states that he believes the change needed to be made to the constitution. That is why the Democrats are back this year with a constitutional amendment. View the Governor's veto message below to learn how he regards this issue of overturning portions of Prop. 209.

Gov. Brown Admits – No Easy Path for Expanded Affirmative Action

KQED News – May 2, 2014

Brown said he believes the April 22 ruling on the Michigan case by the nation’s highest court “shut the door” on any kind of new or expanded racial preferences — unless those rules are enacted by voters.

“It’s not at all clear that if you put it on the ballot, that it could be passed,” he said in the KQED interview.

Brown has long defended affirmative action policies, including during his time as attorney general.

“I do think that because of where we are in the gaps between the races, I think we need some degree of affirmative action,” he said. The governor acknowledged the deep divisions that surfaced during the brief legislative debate over a proposed constitutional amendment to reinstate affirmative action in higher education and contracting in California. But he characterized any effort to bridge that gap as “chancy.” Read more…

Citing use of scare tactics and misinformation by opponents of SCA 5, Senate pro Tem Darrell Steinberg and Assembly Speaker John Perez announced the formation of a joint Senate and Assembly Commission tasked with holding hearings up and down the state to solicit expert testimony, as well as public input, concerning SCA 5 and equal opportunity in California’s public institutions of higher learning. We will list Bay Area meetings of the Commission in the Calendar of Events.

LA Times Article: Democrats Turn on Democrats Who Now Oppose SCA 5 — After They Voted For It

Sac Bee Capitol Alert: As Dems continue to turn on their colleagues, this article proves this issue will resurface in the Democrat controlled legislature

Washington Examiner Article: Asian-Americans in California Send a Message: Race and Gender Preferences Are Obsolete

Democrats Regroup and Pull SCA 5 from the Assembly

Expressing concerns they didn’t have the votes to move forward, SCA5 was returned to the Senate. If the Democrats in the Assembly had followed the lead of their colleagues in the Senate, SCA 5 would have been an initiative on the 2014 November Ballot. If voters approved the measure, all references to public education would be removed from Proposition 209, impacting students who were expecting to enter college based on merit. Always a target for repeal by Democrats in the Legislature, 209 amended the state constitution to prohibit state government institutions from considering race, sex or ethnicity in the areas of public employment, public contracting or public education.

Statement on SCA5 by Republican Senate Leader Bob Huff – March 17, 2014

“Today Speaker Perez sent SCA 5 back to the Senate without taking the matter up in the Assembly. While this is a temporary victory for the many families and students who have rallied against this attempt to re-introduce institutionalized discrimination in our public schools, we must remain vigilant.”

“Senate President pro Tem Steinberg restated in his release that he still supports SCA 5, but wants a “calm and intelligent discussion about what Affirmative Action is and is not.”’

“The people pushing SCA 5 repeatedly try to change the discussion with misinformation, saying that people don’t understand the issue. The opposite is true. There has been an outcry across the state, because people do understand the issue. As summarized by the non-partisan Legislative Counsel regarding SCA 5, “The California Constitution prohibits the state from discriminating against, or granting preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting. This measure would eliminate this prohibition on state discrimination or preference in the operation of public education.” SCA 5 will allow once again institutionalized discrimination in our public schools.”

“As stated famously by Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court, John Roberts: “The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.”’

“Using their super-majority, Democrats passed SCA 5 out of the Senate on January 30th to the Assembly on a party-line vote. Republicans will continue to oppose this measure in any way, shape or form.”