Does Wall Street Do “God’s Work”? Or Even Anything Useful?

来源: career 2016-09-08 19:44:25 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (17817 bytes)

Chew on the following excerpts from an article published yesterday at Naked CapitalismDoes Wall Street Do “God’s Work”? Or Even Anything Useful? 

 
 

In the wake of the 2008 crisis, Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein famously told a reporter that bankers are “doing God’s work.” This is, of course, an important part of the Wall Street mantra: it’s standard operating procedure for bank executives to frequently and loudly proclaim that Wall Street is vital to the nation’s economy and performs socially valuable services by raising capital, providing liquidity to investors, and ensuring that securities are priced accurately so that money flows to where it will be most productive. The mantra is essential, because it allows (non-psychopathic) bankers to look at themselves in the mirror each day, as well as helping them fend off serious attempts at government regulation. It also allows them to claim that they deserve to make outrageous amounts of money. According to the Statistical Abstract of the United States, in 2007 and 2008 employees in the finance industry earned a total of more than $500 billion annually—that’s a whopping half-trillion dollar payroll (Table 1168).

 

There’s just one problem: the Wall Street mantra isn’t true.

 

Let’s start with the notion that Wall Street helps companies raise capital. If we look at the numbers, it’s obvious that raising capital for companies is only a sideline for most banks, and a minor one at that. Corporations raise capital in the so-called “primary” markets where they sell newly-issued stocks and bonds to investors. However, the vast majority of bankers’ time and effort is devoted to (and most bank profits come from) dealing, trading, and advising investors in the so-called “secondary” market where investors buy and sell existing securities with each other. In 2009, for example, less than 10 percent of the securities industry’s profits came from underwriting new stocks and bonds; the majority came instead from trading commissions and trading profits (Table 1219). This figure reflects the imbalance between the primary issuing market (which is relatively small) and the secondary trading market (which is enormous). In 2010, corporations issued only $131 billion in new stock (Table 1202). That same year, the World Bank reports, more than $15 trillion in stocks were traded in the U.S. secondary market– more than the nation’s GDP. Yet secondary market trading is fundamentally a zero sum game—if I make money by buying low and selling high, it’s money you lost by buying high and selling low.

 

So, what benefit does society get from all this secondary market trading, besides very rich and self-satisfied bankers like Blankfein? The bankers would tell you that we get “liquidity”–the ability for investors to sell their investments relatively quickly. The problem with this line of argument is that Wall Street is providing far more liquidity (at a hefty price—remember that half-trillion-dollar payroll) than investors really need. Most of the money invested in stocks, bonds, and other securities comes from individuals who are saving for retirement, either by investing directly or through pension and mutual funds. These long-term investors don’t really need much liquidity, and they certainly don’t need a market where 185 percent of shoes are bought and sold every year. They could get by with much less trading—and in fact, they did get by, quite happily. In 1976, when the transactions costs associated with buying and selling securities were much higher, fewer than 20 percent of equity shares changed hands every year. Yet no one was complaining in 1976 about any supposed lack of liquidity. Today we have nearly 10 times more trading, without any apparent benefit for anyone (other than Wall Street bankers and traders) from all that “liquidity.”

 

So, what does Wall Street do that benefits society? Doctors and nurses make patients healthier. Firefighters and EMTs save lives. Telecommunications companies and smart phone manufacturers permit people to communicate with each other at a distance. Automobile executives and airline pilots help people close that distance. Teachers and professors help students learn. Wall Street bankers help—mostly just themselves.

所有跟帖: 

肯定是something useful.而且很useful 啊。否则08年政府Paulson那些人也不会急成那样。 -greenoasis- 给 greenoasis 发送悄悄话 (62 bytes) () 09/08/2016 postreply 19:58:20

没牛奶? Try better: "soldiers and tanks in the streets" :) -career- 给 career 发送悄悄话 (738 bytes) () 09/08/2016 postreply 20:04:37

这么说吧。现代社会运转到这程度,缺了哪个螺丝钉都会瘫痪。就别说花街这么重要的大螺丝钉了。医生能救命,也不能小看别的行业了 -greenoasis- 给 greenoasis 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 09/08/2016 postreply 20:10:05

9494, 不能小看...It's the gov of, by, and for the bankers. -career- 给 career 发送悄悄话 (369 bytes) () 09/08/2016 postreply 20:13:06

"Paulson left the top job at Goldman Sachs to become Treasury Se -career- 给 career 发送悄悄话 (2656 bytes) () 09/08/2016 postreply 20:09:12

没文化真可怕。 -Hurstian- 给 Hurstian 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 09/08/2016 postreply 20:11:12

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”