只是转帖，有多少可信性科学性咱不知道
On p. 42 of Rushton’s abridged 2nd edition of Race, Evolution and Behavior, he states that ” Race differences in testacle size have also been measured ( Asians= 9 grams, Europeans= 21 grams.”
On the same page Rushton writes that this could mean that Whites produce twice as many sperm a day as do Orientals. He also states that so far we have no information on black testacles.
Asians have various measures of lower sexual experience/events than whites.
This is probably an example of coevolution of genes and culture. A while back at UR, a piece on Asian rice growing was compared to European wheat growing. The claim was made that because of the high degree of cooperation demanded by growing rice …rice paddies and so on, and on the other hand, the relative personal independence permitted by individualistic wheat growing farmers who did not need to cooperate much…that Individualism was fostered in Europe and Collectivism was fostered in Asia.
( With regard to the Fertile Crescent…it is worth considering…I dunno what was grown there but collectivism certainly emerged in the Arabs one way or the other. Of course, Arabs have much lower IQs than East Asians and Whites, so IQ may be a larger factor than just collectivism determined by rapid evolution of temperamental differences. The collectivism of Arabs would seem to be different qualitatively than the collectivism of Asians. )
So. It is conceivable that less aggressiveness is generally required by collectivisitic societies. The systematic weeding out of aggressive men, and women, might also reduce the size of testacles, since testosterone is related to aggression.
Today, wimpy Asian men make perfect collectivistic zombies who do what they are told.
White men today have certainly lost a lot of their balls, psychologically, but that is because they are no longer individualistic and independent farmers or small businessmen of any sort…more or less, mostly more, and have become Organization Men working on the Plantation, even if making big bucks. Get along, go along.
Big balls need to be constrained by big brains, which helps to explain why Whites have been able to control themselves and build the best societies in the world. Blacks are so stupid that they cannot control themselves anywhere, and they are neither individualistic nor collectivistic. They are just chaotic, and require absolute rule by a dictator. This is also true of Arabs, not nearly as stupid as blacks, but still pretty dumb…85 average in Richard Lynn. Arabs also need the dictator or despot to rule them. （也别骂土共了，一个国家社会怎么样，是由国民的生物基因决定的
)
It would be interesting to discover the relative weights of Arab and Turkic testacles and also the Africans’. Rushton has blacks possessing 10 to 20% more testosterone than whites, but has no data on Asians. Behavioral patterns of the 3 major races also reflects testosterone levels, or other hormones, etc. The quiet Asian child and adult vs. the blacks jumping around and the Whites in between. The ‘moderate’ or Goldilocks position seems to be best from the point of view of democratic republican government where elections are tolerated as the pragmatic way to solve problems.
This is not just biologism, it is arguably gene-culture coevolution.
Joe Webb
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”
