I folded a piece of graph paper, and found (m,n) to be roughly (

来源: BeLe 于 2010-09-04 06:44:02 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读： 0 次 (86 bytes)
本文内容已被 [ BeLe ] 在 2010-09-04 06:52:17 编辑过。如有问题，请报告版主或论坛管理删除.
回答: rl's explanation 由 rlmom 于 2010-09-04 06:31:28

I folded a piece of graph paper, and found (m, n) to be roughly (0.5, 6).




所有跟帖： 

• 回复：I folded a piece of graph paper, and found (m,n) to be roughl -rlmom- ♀ 给 rlmom 发送悄悄话 rlmom 的博客首页 (510 bytes) () 09/04/2010 postreply 07:06:23

• your way -rlmom- ♀ 给 rlmom 发送悄悄话 rlmom 的博客首页 (235 bytes) () 09/04/2010 postreply 07:20:53

• "with virtually any slope". That is not true. -BeLe- ♀ 给 BeLe 发送悄悄话 BeLe 的博客首页 (92 bytes) () 09/04/2010 postreply 07:24:27

• The two lines are not parallel. Instead of a paralleogram, you s -BeLe- ♀ 给 BeLe 发送悄悄话 BeLe 的博客首页 (234 bytes) () 09/04/2010 postreply 07:21:09

• 回复：The two lines are not parallel. Instead of a paralleogram, yo -rlmom- ♀ 给 rlmom 发送悄悄话 rlmom 的博客首页 (248 bytes) () 09/04/2010 postreply 07:39:48

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”