that's for commercial gain. it's totally different. see Legal Ri

that's for commercial gain. it's totally different. see Legal Rights of Photographer. Basically if the photographer didn't use any special equipment, the one being photographed didn't make an effort to not to be seen, photographer isn't trying to distort the image, and not for commerical gains, then he can publish anything that's open to public.

http://www.andrewkantor.com/useful/Legal-Rights-of-Photographers.pdf

所有跟帖： 

• 是吗? 有公司用我的照片, 都是拿了合同跟我签约的. -*蔷薇*- ♀ (83 bytes) () 11/02/2010 postreply 18:57:21

• 那是商业用途吧，也会有对你的行为的要求。但像如果试镜，可不会跟你签这种合同的，都算公司财产。 -Kamioka- ♀ (0 bytes) () 11/02/2010 postreply 19:33:22