well, why dont u find a scenario that ...

来源: panzerkom 2010-11-18 14:30:22 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 0 次 (1188 bytes)
回答: if one truly wants a somwhat objective ...7.52010-11-18 13:57:21

is more like the shanghai fire? then we can talk. i do agree that no two fires are exactly the same.

 

with regards to WTC, i have 2 points to make:

1. the towers did NOT collapse right away, and when they did (about an hour and a half for the north tower and about an hour for the south), they did so not because of impact damage but because of the FIRE. if the fire could have been put out or suppressed (and i'm not saying that it could), the buildings themselves and people who were trapped would have been saved.

2. the shanghai fire department did have equipment that reach up to 30-something floors, but not higher. you would've seen those, if you watched the news clips. fighting high-rise fires from within the building is common practice. again, in the case of the WTC, the vast majority of those that survived escaped by running down the stairwell; and the firefighters who died were in the building fighting the fire and saving people. i personally do not know of any WTC survivor who were rescued by fire engine ladder units. i would appreciate it if you can prove me wrong by showing cases of people being rescued by ladder units.

所有跟帖: 

回复:well, why dont u find a scenario that ... -7.5- 给 7.5 发送悄悄话 7.5 的博客首页 (1392 bytes) () 11/18/2010 postreply 15:06:12

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”