Theoritical speaking: should we allow siblings get married,

as far as they do not have child(ren) between themselves? This is the question for people pro-same-sex "marriage". If you are against marriage between siblings, what is your reason? (I think "civil union", which allows economic benefits, is more suitable for this situation. I think "marriage" was "created" for the benefits of [biological] children.)

所有跟帖： 

• 乱伦这么起劲。。。 -A_Momy- ♀ (0 bytes) () 10/14/2008 postreply 09:19:01

• ???? 回复：乱伦这么起劲。。。 -N.- ♀ (0 bytes) () 10/14/2008 postreply 09:24:01

• 这问题没法讨论。 -A_Momy- ♀ (0 bytes) () 10/14/2008 postreply 09:26:18

• 出格，您先讨论一下表兄妹婚姻吧 -study- ♀ (106 bytes) () 10/14/2008 postreply 09:20:57

• why 愿闻其详 -A_Momy- ♀ (0 bytes) () 10/14/2008 postreply 09:25:09

• I think the reason for outlawing it is because of children. -N.- ♀ (184 bytes) () 10/14/2008 postreply 09:27:00

• 那 父女母子呢？以此推类。。。太吓人。 -A_Momy- ♀ (0 bytes) () 10/14/2008 postreply 09:29:17

• 那你定个LAW,让他们先绝育再结婚? -2`- ♂ (0 bytes) () 10/14/2008 postreply 09:30:10

• 如果不加倍产生21三体,也没什么反对的必要. -2`- ♂ (0 bytes) () 10/14/2008 postreply 09:22:24

• 好奇你有孩子吗？对于这些问题你都怎么教育他们的？ -empyrean8- ♀ (0 bytes) () 10/14/2008 postreply 09:36:02

• 和我现在说的一样. -2`- ♂ (0 bytes) () 10/14/2008 postreply 09:38:18

• very scary -A_Momy- ♀ (0 bytes) () 10/14/2008 postreply 09:40:51

• 对你这样的:)) -2`- ♂ (43 bytes) () 10/14/2008 postreply 09:45:02