回复:这几十个博士仅仅读了黎安友的前言,气愤不过,根本没有读过原文。

来源: akc 2008-03-02 07:19:22 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 0 次 (408 bytes)
The problem with the book, whether in English or Chinese, is that it mixes the truth with "not so truth". We won't know which is which until we have read the original manu written by Dr. Li. There was no denying that Li was Mao's "private" doctor. We have seen a lot of Li's photos taken with Mao.
Chang Jung's Mao book was so evident. Believe what you want to believe. It is not worth rebutting.
请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”