Is this law or adminstrative regulation?
Even if it is Law, can it override the Chinese civil law and criminal law?
How should we categorize "dog" owned by chinese citizen based on chinese civil law and constitution? is it personal property? Yes, you could regulate what property people own. But can you destroy it or confisticate it without any legal procedure? Or just inform you hey i am a police/whatever, you dog don't havesuch and such, so i am gonna get it and kill it.
If you want to get into people's house and destroy their property, shall you get some warrant -- this regulation didn't require it, but based on chinese civil/criminal procedure law -- yes you have to have it unless there is immediate danger. But is it the case?Shall we say then on this respect, this regulation/law is illegal.
and based on the Chinese law, even people who are convicted by court can appeal, but in the dog case, can anybody appeal?
When we talk about "state/public interest", how and who gonna protect individual citizen and their property?
This looks reasonable, but if you think deeper
所有跟帖:
•
现在的报道好像是:北京市民纷纷欢迎入户查抄狗
-妙妙~-
♀
(306 bytes)
()
11/13/2006 postreply
10:32:45
•
但是反对养狗的人,比赞成养狗的真的要多的多
-喵呜子-
♀
(95 bytes)
()
11/13/2006 postreply
10:35:27
•
我也反对没有条件养狗,但是绝对不赞成屠杀。
-妙妙~-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
11/13/2006 postreply
10:37:46
•
我也不赞成屠杀,但是我想让大家看的比较全面
-喵呜子-
♀
(249 bytes)
()
11/13/2006 postreply
10:42:40
•
反对养狗的人比赞成养狗的要多的多,where is this statistic coming
-lily2216-
♀
(46 bytes)
()
11/13/2006 postreply
10:40:07
•
你真的觉得在中国赞成养狗的人比反对的多吗?
-喵呜子-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
11/13/2006 postreply
10:45:34
•
I don't know it. I do know many people do have dogs
-lily2216-
♀
(188 bytes)
()
11/13/2006 postreply
10:59:13
•
If you don't like it/against it, it deserves to die?
-lily2216-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
11/13/2006 postreply
10:44:59
•
How do you know? Did you conduct referendum?
-名花有主-
♀
(37 bytes)
()
11/13/2006 postreply
11:06:12
•
不是中国公民,不懂中国的法律,但是我觉得执行肯定有不对的地方
-喵呜子-
♀
(55 bytes)
()
11/13/2006 postreply
10:32:46
•
What I am saying is if you speak strictly about law
-lily2216-
♀
(121 bytes)
()
11/13/2006 postreply
10:38:43
•
我就是ZT个条例,没别的意思
-喵呜子-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
11/13/2006 postreply
10:48:23
•
i know, I just say my opinion about that regulation u post
-lily2216-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
11/13/2006 postreply
10:51:54
•
So good argument!!!
-名花有主-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
11/13/2006 postreply
11:04:30