You are right about number 1, but in order for us to

来源: thrawn 2006-08-16 16:33:16 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 0 次 (792 bytes)
compare, we must see two countries with comparable military do battle to know what air tactics would be like? However, there isn't any such battles between two big countries saved the Korean War. Even in Korean War, US do send fighers and bombers to attack targets that are in enemy territory without land support. As I do recall, airplanes are used in SUPPORT of land operations, not the other way around.

2. I agree with u again, but I haven't seen the useage of so called strategical bombers yet. Have you?

3. Since naval guns couldn't out outreach anti-ship missles, then would it be the air force's job to take down those missiles sites beyond the naval guns' range? So in fact, it is the air force's job to support the Navy and not the Navy supporting the Air Force?
请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”