I'm just talking about land based AAs which will use terrain.

来源: thrawn 2006-08-16 10:49:56 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 0 次 (476 bytes)
Also I've mentioned MOBILE AA's? Those that can move and deploy anywhere? The enemy won't have an accurate position if they are stationary and then moved to somewhere else. If an area WAS clear, the enemy wouldn't hesitate to chase any airplanes into it. If using mobile AAs and move into clear area in conjecture with the bait and lure tactic, the enemy may not know about the new AAs until too late. There are many similar tactics out there, I'm just listing an example

所有跟帖: 

My point was: such trick won't be successful because -Giantfan- 给 Giantfan 发送悄悄话 (223 bytes) () 08/16/2006 postreply 11:04:19

please look at the recent Isreal and US battles. Which -thrawn- 给 thrawn 发送悄悄话 thrawn 的博客首页 (135 bytes) () 08/16/2006 postreply 12:18:16

1. They faced inferior armies technology wise; Air superiority -Giantfan- 给 Giantfan 发送悄悄话 (637 bytes) () 08/16/2006 postreply 13:32:37

You are right about number 1, but in order for us to -thrawn- 给 thrawn 发送悄悄话 thrawn 的博客首页 (792 bytes) () 08/16/2006 postreply 16:33:16

strategic bombers can travel into territories with -thrawn- 给 thrawn 发送悄悄话 thrawn 的博客首页 (697 bytes) () 08/16/2006 postreply 12:29:36

If I am not mistaken strategic bombers can climb up to -Giantfan- 给 Giantfan 发送悄悄话 (480 bytes) () 08/16/2006 postreply 13:41:31

I don't think strategical bombers can climb that high, -thrawn- 给 thrawn 发送悄悄话 thrawn 的博客首页 (468 bytes) () 08/16/2006 postreply 16:26:39

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”