you summarized the first-year law school contracts class pretty well. However, the question is never whether the contract is valid or not; rather, the question is what kind of termination clause there is. If the contract specifically provides that either party can walk way without paying any damages to the other, then the original poster would have no case.
回复:回复:房屋卖方违约,买方有何权利?
本文内容已被 [ itelya ] 在 2004-02-03 07:43:22 编辑过。如有问题,请报告版主或论坛管理删除.
所有跟帖:
• 回复:回复:回复:房屋卖方违约,买方有何权利? -bxt- ♀ (100 bytes) () 11/06/2003 postreply 11:13:00