I will 争一争，If I have 理

来源: lvtotravel 于 2005-07-20 19:39:05 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 阅读数 : (685 bytes)
回答: Wow, what an advice ! 由 Lvtotravel 于 2005-07-20 14:41:07

However, from what the OP posted, I am not sure if he (or she - we dont know) has 理 or not.

My wild guess is, they might not, and already paid the rental car company. (judging by the fact they did not keep the contract - if you have good 理, wouldn't you safeguard the contract and fight to the end ?) However, now they may realize their car insurance may cover the damage minor deductibles - but it requires the rental car contract to prove the insurance holder also listed as additional driver on the contract which they threw away (lost). So they asked here.

Unless the person come back to give all the details, nobody would know. It is only my wild guess.

所有跟帖： 

• 证据在美国就是理，没合同也就没证据，怎能告你。否则签合同何用 -老山羊- ♂ 给 老山羊 发送悄悄话 (292 bytes) () 07/21/2005 postreply 08:34:02

• you did not get the tricky pt -Lvtotravel- ♀ 给 Lvtotravel 发送悄悄话 (884 bytes) () 07/21/2005 postreply 12:23:59

• More over, T&C on Master Cont -Lvtotravel- ♀ 给 Lvtotravel 发送悄悄话 (676 bytes) () 07/21/2005 postreply 12:28:30

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！