《美国的资本在谁的口袋里？》 - 把我四年多前在别的地方发表的小文的链接放在这里：

http://hx.cnd.org/?p=102700

 

 

所有跟帖： 

• 华尔街只不过是给这些 institutional investors 打工的。 -Porcelana- ♀ (0 bytes) () 12/06/2018 postreply 14:24:31

• Institutional investors的投资行为是会受政治影响的。一个例子是 -Porcelana- ♀ (138 bytes) () 12/06/2018 postreply 14:57:49

• Your机构投资者have only $20T AUM--about 1/8 of US wealth. -career- ♂ (0 bytes) () 12/06/2018 postreply 15:30:14

• The other 7/8 美国的资本在富有的个人和家族的口袋里. -career- ♂ (0 bytes) () 12/06/2018 postreply 15:33:12

• 华尔街是mainly给这些富有的个人和家族打工的。 -career- ♂ (0 bytes) () 12/06/2018 postreply 15:34:24

• You should count only the investable assets, not total -Porcelana- ♀ (159 bytes) () 12/06/2018 postreply 15:47:17

• That means institutional investors accounted for 60% -Porcelana- ♀ (76 bytes) () 12/06/2018 postreply 15:56:49

• $33.5T are less than just the bond market! What a joker! -career- ♂ (3256 bytes) () 12/06/2018 postreply 16:00:02

• If I own $1 bond from you and you own $1 bond from me, the total -Porcelana- ♀ (123 bytes) () 12/06/2018 postreply 16:11:55

• Now that bond is not *your* "investable assets", what's in your -career- ♂ (389 bytes) () 12/06/2018 postreply 16:21:17

• But you also have $1 debt。So the net asset is $0。 -Porcelana- ♀ (0 bytes) () 12/06/2018 postreply 16:27:43

• Pls answer my question--"what's in your $33.5T?" -career- ♂ (0 bytes) () 12/06/2018 postreply 16:35:50

• Net investable assets of all individuals and institutions. -Porcelana- ♀ (0 bytes) () 12/06/2018 postreply 16:38:30

• What are they? How you value them at $33.5T as you claimed? -career- ♂ (0 bytes) () 12/06/2018 postreply 17:01:42

• Read this short article： -Porcelana- ♀ (748 bytes) () 12/06/2018 postreply 17:07:58

• Nowhere it says your $33.5T...Stop 忽悠ing! -career- ♂ (440 bytes) () 12/06/2018 postreply 17:15:40

• Calm down！That’s for you to know the definition. This is where -Porcelana- ♀ (236 bytes) () 12/06/2018 postreply 17:19:29

• "does not include banking and other financial assets"--Work hard -career- ♂ (4820 bytes) () 12/06/2018 postreply 17:46:11

• Your 401K may be managed by JPM。If we count JPM your 401K will -Porcelana- ♀ (49 bytes) () 12/06/2018 postreply 17:50:59

• Your Mr. Nobody reporter can't count right for you... -career- ♂ (491 bytes) () 12/06/2018 postreply 18:09:20

• The best of 大忽悠2018! -career- ♂ (0 bytes) () 12/06/2018 postreply 16:27:22

• 我觉得更有趣的问题是：美国资本的话语权在谁手上？ -tgmomtobe- ♀ (305 bytes) () 12/06/2018 postreply 17:38:50

• 大的方向和Policies是这些institutional investors设定，细节和操作则交给华尔街的投资公司。 -Porcelana- ♀ (0 bytes) () 12/06/2018 postreply 18:06:24

• 能说说这些投资机构的董事会成员(大股东都是谁)，有多少股份吗？ -Sarahzhou- ♀ (0 bytes) () 12/06/2018 postreply 17:42:14

• 我在文章里举了 CalPERS 的例子。 -Porcelana- ♀ (0 bytes) () 12/06/2018 postreply 17:45:24

• 啊呀刚知道瓷娃=探春=小羊 -slow_quick- ♂ (0 bytes) () 12/06/2018 postreply 18:54:34