Neal Lane, who wrote the article "Science Is the Key to Growth",
所有跟帖:
• In the long term,美国政客从来不需要考虑4年以后的事情 -mooseamoose- ♂ (0 bytes) () 11/05/2012 postreply 21:38:40
• 管他谁写的。写的有没有道理是关键。你说共和党支持科研它就支持了吗?拿出证据来。 -post123- ♂ (93 bytes) () 11/06/2012 postreply 04:07:08
• Agreed. We can expect an anti-science party to -高船- ♂ (59 bytes) () 11/06/2012 postreply 04:21:18
• Typical republican arguments that are completely delusional and -高船- ♂ (617 bytes) () 11/06/2012 postreply 04:14:05
• Lane当过NSF的头和克林顿的科技顾问.评论此事,他有足够的资历和权威. -weston- ♀ (22260 bytes) () 11/06/2012 postreply 07:04:05
• 严重支持!分析和评论必须以事实为依据,再说 -高船- ♂ (93 bytes) () 11/06/2012 postreply 07:30:14
• 在最佳情况下他那个cut能省200bil.开掉tax cut,军费增长R的预算会严重亏损.所以克林顿 -weston- ♀ (80 bytes) () 11/06/2012 postreply 07:53:44
• Arithmetic! Arithmetic! 基本算术!基本算术!回答 -高船- ♂ (93 bytes) () 11/06/2012 postreply 08:17:24
• 咣当! -clipmom- ♀ (113 bytes) () 11/06/2012 postreply 07:38:10
• 考考西妈用数据说话的能力,哈哈. -weston- ♀ (0 bytes) () 11/06/2012 postreply 07:50:45
• Budget deficits are not primarily due to wars. -西西妈- ♀ (4228 bytes) () 11/06/2012 postreply 18:13:10
• You said a lot of things, but didn't answer my question, which w -weston- ♀ (221 bytes) () 11/06/2012 postreply 19:22:13
• 同意!花钱该有回报。每年1 -soundofsilence- ♀ (126 bytes) () 11/06/2012 postreply 09:08:22