回复:回复:I heard if someone got injured in your house, the ho

来源: 68106 2005-12-07 16:03:57 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (682 bytes)
本文内容已被 [ 68106 ] 在 2006-01-03 08:15:59 编辑过。如有问题,请报告版主或论坛管理删除.
Just want to make sure
(1) should landowners own the same duty to his invitees as Gap owns to its customers? it seems to me that they all root from NEGLIGENCE, not a seperate bruch of tort law.
(2) when interprete the applicable rule, will court construe it broadly when injured party is a little kid who has little ability to find out the danger?
(3) can injured party claim "business practicce" rule? which says that "a merchant that uses such a self-service method of sale must bear the burden of showing what steps were taken to avoid the foreseeable risk og harm." if the jurisdiction recognize the rule, the injured party will have less burden of proof.

所有跟帖: 

回复:回复:回复:I heard if someone got injured in your house, -66196- 给 66196 发送悄悄话 (2772 bytes) () 12/07/2005 postreply 17:04:12

business practice rule -68106- 给 68106 发送悄悄话 (1296 bytes) () 12/08/2005 postreply 10:43:31

Sounds like a good rule -66196- 给 66196 发送悄悄话 (1628 bytes) () 12/08/2005 postreply 13:30:30

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”