The filing of informal response and reply briefs is optional.

https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/AppellateProcedureGuide/Briefing/APG-informalbriefing.html#pID0ELHA

You are a pro se litigant, therefore informal briefing applies to you.  However, Fed Cir rules says "The filing of informal response and reply briefs is optional."

I think the other party is going to follow Fed Cir local rule 34(a) to proceed directly to oral argument. 

http://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/docs/rules/rule34.pdf

I'd guess your argument is so weak/irrelevant that the other party didn't even bother to respond in writing. 

所有跟帖： 

• For this kind of litigation, hearing must be required, and it is -caizane- ♂ (272 bytes) () 05/31/2018 postreply 06:20:18

• The rule is clear. -柠檬椰子汁- ♂ (1172 bytes) () 05/31/2018 postreply 06:27:12

• 这个案子只有federal circuit Court rule 适用 -caizane- ♂ (400 bytes) () 05/31/2018 postreply 06:41:39

• reply to your informal brief is optional, they choose not to rep -柠檬椰子汁- ♂ (259 bytes) () 05/31/2018 postreply 06:55:50

• 可能是这样 -caizane- ♂ (449 bytes) () 05/31/2018 postreply 07:12:44

• reply is optional, no reply is not default to lose -柠檬椰子汁- ♂ (106 bytes) () 05/31/2018 postreply 08:06:42

• 看吧 -caizane- ♂ (401 bytes) () 05/31/2018 postreply 08:19:47

• 还有可能是 -caizane- ♂ (265 bytes) () 05/31/2018 postreply 08:42:46

• 也可能是你申诉的对象错了。 -柠檬椰子汁- ♂ (633 bytes) () 05/31/2018 postreply 09:08:00

• 这都不是问题 -caizane- ♂ (220 bytes) () 05/31/2018 postreply 09:17:28

• 既然你这么有信心，那么就坐着等赢吧。 -柠檬椰子汁- ♂ (57 bytes) () 05/31/2018 postreply 09:23:05

• 看吧 -caizane- ♂ (98 bytes) () 05/31/2018 postreply 09:59:22

• 如是这样就好 -caizane- ♂ (310 bytes) () 05/31/2018 postreply 07:18:06

• 这个案子没有oral argument -caizane- ♂ (151 bytes) () 05/31/2018 postreply 06:27:01

• 书面回复是必须的 -caizane- ♂ (298 bytes) () 05/31/2018 postreply 06:48:10