CMU is much harder to get in for ABC boys

来源: whaled 2019-04-08 21:39:20 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 0 次 (1201 bytes)
本文内容已被 [ whaled ] 在 2019-04-08 21:51:19 编辑过。如有问题,请报告版主或论坛管理删除.

SCS selects it students from the national/international pool while EECS pulls most its students from instate. SCS  accepts less than 20 ABC boys every year. While CA is competitive, but most tops ABC boys, including 80% top math/stem talents are from outside of California. Beside MS, SCS is these kid's top choice. This makes SCS extremly hard to get in for ABC boys. A CA ABC boy will have to match the calibers of these Non-CA kids to get in to SCS, which is likely to be significantly harder. Wether a CA boy prefers to go EECS since it makes more economic sense is a different issue.

SCS likes top Math performers and requirea all students to submit AMC and AIME scores if they have them. MIT and CalTech are the only other schools requiring these scores. A few years back it was said that SCS students had a medium score of 6. That was about top 20% of AIME scorers. Today it is only going to be higher for ABC boys.

That said, SCS can be easier for CA girls since EECS does not have gender AA but SCS has.

 

所有跟帖: 

别吓人了,根本就是和藤不一样的入学要求,也就是和EECS差不多的要求。而弯曲读CS有地域优势, -Progressive- 给 Progressive 发送悄悄话 (303 bytes) () 04/08/2019 postreply 22:42:35

SCS cares more about math -whaled- 给 whaled 发送悄悄话 (21 bytes) () 04/08/2019 postreply 22:48:45

EECS too,besides CS,math,also engineering。 -Progressive- 给 Progressive 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 04/08/2019 postreply 23:39:21

加州娃可能会首选EECS,VS. SCS 。 个人观点 -眼镜- 给 眼镜 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 04/08/2019 postreply 21:44:27

That is probably true -whaled- 给 whaled 发送悄悄话 (118 bytes) () 04/08/2019 postreply 21:54:48

It's not all about cost, it's the location! -眼镜- 给 眼镜 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 04/08/2019 postreply 22:04:38

那当然了,加州娃就在家门口当然是UCB了 -锦衣卫- 给 锦衣卫 发送悄悄话 锦衣卫 的博客首页 (372 bytes) () 04/08/2019 postreply 22:02:46

那当然了,加州娃就在家门口当然是UCB了 -锦衣卫- 给 锦衣卫 发送悄悄话 锦衣卫 的博客首页 (372 bytes) () 04/08/2019 postreply 22:03:14

要AIME分数的对小中就不算难,难的是十分考察软实力的学校。从录取率看,很多学生并不申请CSC -volleyball22- 给 volleyball22 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 04/08/2019 postreply 22:10:31

There are more SCS applicants than CalTech -whaled- 给 whaled 发送悄悄话 (306 bytes) () 04/08/2019 postreply 22:32:21

People who apply for math, physics, ece, theater etc. may also -volleyball22- 给 volleyball22 发送悄悄话 (280 bytes) () 04/08/2019 postreply 22:45:12

现在讲录取率实在没有太大的意思,都是不一样的pool的人在申请,没有可比性的。 -Progressive- 给 Progressive 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 04/08/2019 postreply 23:50:05

不要强调CMU有多难进了,其实这个逻辑很简单的。加州的STEM学生是优先考虑CalTech,S,EECS的。如果CMU想要招加州 -Progressive- 给 Progressive 发送悄悄话 (1119 bytes) () 04/08/2019 postreply 23:37:40

SCS does not need many CA boys -whaled- 给 whaled 发送悄悄话 (292 bytes) () 04/09/2019 postreply 03:01:26

这种争论有意思吗。不管CMU多厉害,who cares,人家EECS的出路已经非常满意了。CMU EECS都排第一也没有谁高半个 -Progressive- 给 Progressive 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 04/09/2019 postreply 03:54:45

CMUMIT的cs主要面向东部。那就足够多的学生了。加州的学生的确很少。 -reader007- 给 reader007 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 04/09/2019 postreply 03:18:36

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”