If there is on other evidence, why do you assume zimmean is guilty? Why should we assume a bum is innocent in the confrontation? Just because he is black? Libertard.
do those bums need a reason to attack people?
所有跟帖:
•
So you assume. Please watch your language first,
-丁庄秀园-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
07/15/2013 postreply
18:37:28
•
by law if there is not enough evidence, zimmerman is not guilty.
-kabab-
♂
(38 bytes)
()
07/15/2013 postreply
18:46:37